|
Post by Evil Yoda on Mar 25, 2015 8:50:23 GMT -5
I'm sure many of them will. It's still amusing when candidates make mistakes. Supporting Ted Cruz might be that "staggeringly dumb" GOP move that puts a Dem in the whitehouse in '16. I believe Obama is worse that W was, but a lot of people don't agree. A Republican challenger won't have the groundswell of incumbent hate that Obama rode into office. I don't think this is so much a mistake as it is failing to plan ahead. FWIW, if Hillary continues and survives the scandals, she probably beats Cruz. If she drops out, Cruz beats Warren and/or Biden. Isn't planning ahead a fairly important skill for a world leader?
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Mar 25, 2015 8:50:29 GMT -5
Damned straight... keep on believing it... intelligent people read your comments and just shake their heads... Yes, at the corruption, racism, and incompetence that we have allowed to infect the entire regime, but especially the DOJ. SMH...
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Mar 25, 2015 8:52:43 GMT -5
Going to take a nap... SMH and ...
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Mar 25, 2015 12:04:33 GMT -5
You're assuming Holder and/or Lynch would indict Hillary under ANY circumstances. If Congress finds it's balls, he may not have a choice. Besides, he's still under criminal charges of contempt, why should he even be asked? Let someone under him make the decision, someone that hasn't been as tainted with the Marxist mantra. I wonder why he's still in DOJ instead of Rykers. Congress can only recommend the DOJ file charges. That still leaves it up to Holder to make the decision.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Mar 25, 2015 12:08:05 GMT -5
I don't think this is so much a mistake as it is failing to plan ahead. FWIW, if Hillary continues and survives the scandals, she probably beats Cruz. If she drops out, Cruz beats Warren and/or Biden. Isn't planning ahead a fairly important skill for a world leader? Sure. But tedcruz.com is really a very minor problem. Look, I'm not saying he's a good candidate, just that most every presidential candidate is going to run into these sorts of problems. There are plenty of important reasons to prefer someone other than Ted Cruz win the GOP nomination. This is not one of them. By the way - Hillary.com also isn't owned by Hillary Clinton - it's a software company. Granted it doesn't say "support Obama"
|
|
|
Post by rentedmule on Mar 25, 2015 13:44:42 GMT -5
I'm unsure what the OP is all about? Someone seems to have the time and resources required to commit a political prank? I wonder why the Democrat Party would be giving this challenger any recognition at all. Is the JV team now working the party?
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Mar 25, 2015 13:46:42 GMT -5
I'm unsure what the OP is all about? Someone seems to have the time and resources required to commit a political prank? I wonder why the Democrat Party would be giving this challenger any recognition at all. Is the JV team now working the party? Well, in the Democrats' defense, the last group they called the "JV team" has made them look really, really incompetent. I can understand why they'd be worried.
|
|
|
Post by rentedmule on Mar 25, 2015 13:54:57 GMT -5
I'm unsure what the OP is all about? Someone seems to have the time and resources required to commit a political prank? I wonder why the Democrat Party would be giving this challenger any recognition at all. Is the JV team now working the party? Well, in the Democrats' defense, the last group they called the "JV team" has made them look really, really incompetent. I can understand why they'd be worried. The JV team has driven the US military forces from Yemen, the President of the country has fled, and the Saudi's are brandishing swords on the border. Apparently this administration handles their political adversaries as well as they do foreign policy!
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Mar 25, 2015 14:05:20 GMT -5
Well, in the Democrats' defense, the last group they called the "JV team" has made them look really, really incompetent. I can understand why they'd be worried. The JV team has driven the US military forces from Yemen, the President of the country has fled, and the Saudi's are brandishing swords on the border. Apparently this administration handles their political adversaries as well as they do foreign policy! No way, rentedmule. The Obama administration tries to thwart their political adversaries at every opportunity - even when it is in their best interest not to - and won't even talk to Republicans. On the other hand, they bend over backwards to try to reach agreements with international adversaries like Iran and Russia. So, no. This administration treats foreign military adversaries much better than domestic political adversaries.
|
|
|
Post by rocketwolf on Mar 25, 2015 14:50:35 GMT -5
I'm unsure what the OP is all about? Someone seems to have the time and resources required to commit a political prank? I wonder why the Democrat Party would be giving this challenger any recognition at all. Is the JV team now working the party? The OP seems to really dislike politicans and business of all stripes, but seems to reserve special scorn for Repubs. His list seems to run in this order in dislikes 1 Religion 2 Repubs 3 Corporations 4 Dems 5 any other business As the stupid lion on TV says, Just my 2 cents
|
|
|
Post by Evil Yoda on Mar 25, 2015 17:02:32 GMT -5
The OP seems to really dislike politicans and business of all stripes, but seems to reserve special scorn for Repubs. His list seems to run in this order in dislikes 1 Religion 2 Repubs 3 Corporations 4 Dems 5 any other business As the stupid lion on TV says, Just my 2 cents Wow. You got all that from a comical post about a man who didn't plan ahead? And while we're back on the subject of Ted Cruz, and off the subject of me, how about the fact he was born in Canada? Where are the birthers objecting? Sure, his mother told the Canadians she was born in the United States, but... what if she lied? I'll expect the birthers to demand a full investigation! Oh, man, the Ted Cruz campaign is going to be a gold mine of humor!
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Mar 25, 2015 18:57:14 GMT -5
Don't count on that. With Puppettax, Fast and Furious, the Middle East disaster, Russia, the border and amnesty, The Puppet may have relegated the Dems to minority status for years to come. The only ones still supporting him are those like Aboutwell, who are more than happy to live in a Communist dictatorship, as long as their checks keep coming. But it's mostly the far right that's consumed by that - folks like you and RJ. As opposed to the tidal wave of Bush 43 incompetence Obama sailed in on. Most of the country regarded 43 as a screw-up of the first water, and since then what support he had among the GOP has drained away to just a few, again, hard core righties. The rest want to pretend he never existed. And they have since discovered that what they put in his place is an unmitigated disaster, anti American, and far more concerned with some fantasy of utopia than with dealing with the real world. Even many LIVs are realizing that this was the worst possible thing they could have done. And given that even hard core Marxists are now calling for HHS to "delay" more of Pupettax, what will happen when the full consequences of that abomination take hold? Think we are losing jobs now?
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Mar 25, 2015 19:01:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Mar 25, 2015 19:03:05 GMT -5
The OP seems to really dislike politicans and business of all stripes, but seems to reserve special scorn for Repubs. His list seems to run in this order in dislikes 1 Religion 2 Repubs 3 Corporations 4 Dems 5 any other business As the stupid lion on TV says, Just my 2 cents Wow. You got all that from a comical post about a man who didn't plan ahead? And while we're back on the subject of Ted Cruz, and off the subject of me, how about the fact he was born in Canada? Where are the birthers objecting? Sure, his mother told the Canadians she was born in the United States, but... what if she lied? I'll expect the birthers to demand a full investigation! Oh, man, the Ted Cruz campaign is going to be a gold mine of humor! The difference is, Cruz is being vetted hysterically, The Puppet wasn't even asked the question.
|
|
|
Post by Evil Yoda on Mar 25, 2015 19:20:48 GMT -5
And they have since discovered that what they put in his place They didn't put anybody "in his place" since Bush had served both of the terms the Constitution entitled him to. Rather, his incompetence scared people so badly they picked a guy with no experience and that didn't work out too well. My point is that a lot of people think Obama is better than 43. I don't agree, but I'm only one vote.
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Mar 25, 2015 19:39:32 GMT -5
"..........and potentially open him up to criminal prosecution for contempt of Congress....."And that was over 16 months ago... what is the status of that now?...
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Mar 25, 2015 19:52:14 GMT -5
Wow. You got all that from a comical post about a man who didn't plan ahead? And while we're back on the subject of Ted Cruz, and off the subject of me, how about the fact he was born in Canada? Where are the birthers objecting? Sure, his mother told the Canadians she was born in the United States, but... what if she lied? I'll expect the birthers to demand a full investigation! Oh, man, the Ted Cruz campaign is going to be a gold mine of humor! The difference is, Cruz is being vetted hysterically, The Puppet wasn't even asked the question. I'm sure Obama was "vetted" before he was allowed on the Democratic ballot as a candidate...
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Mar 25, 2015 20:21:23 GMT -5
And they have since discovered that what they put in his place They didn't put anybody "in his place" since Bush had served both of the terms the Constitution entitled him to. Rather, his incompetence scared people so badly they picked a guy with no experience and that didn't work out too well. My point is that a lot of people think Obama is better than 43. I don't agree, but I'm only one vote. A lot of people backed Hitler, too. A lot of people still back Lenin. That doesn't make them either right, or smart.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Mar 25, 2015 20:23:00 GMT -5
"..........and potentially open him up to criminal prosecution for contempt of Congress....."And that was over 16 months ago... what is the status of that now?... He wasn't impeached because he was doing what The Puppet and his Merry Marxists were telling him to do, so the Marxists, who controlled Congress then, weren't about to impeach the only one that could stop their own criminal trials.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Mar 25, 2015 20:23:41 GMT -5
The difference is, Cruz is being vetted hysterically, The Puppet wasn't even asked the question. I'm sure Obama was "vetted" before he was allowed on the Democratic ballot as a candidate... Yes, he was asked "are you a Communist", and when he said yes, he was in like Flint.
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Mar 25, 2015 20:29:31 GMT -5
They didn't put anybody "in his place" since Bush had served both of the terms the Constitution entitled him to. Rather, his incompetence scared people so badly they picked a guy with no experience and that didn't work out too well. My point is that a lot of people think Obama is better than 43. I don't agree, but I'm only one vote. A lot of people backed Hitler, too. A lot of people still back Lenin. That doesn't make them either right, or smart. I've mentioned that several times recently with reference to Ronald Reagan... you're right...
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Mar 25, 2015 20:31:29 GMT -5
"..........and potentially open him up to criminal prosecution for contempt of Congress....."And that was over 16 months ago... what is the status of that now?... He wasn't impeached because he was doing what The Puppet and his Merry Marxists were telling him to do, so the Marxists, who controlled Congress then, weren't about to impeach the only one that could stop their own criminal trials. I didn't comment on "impeaching" him... I commented on your false claim that he charged with criminal contempt... he is, and was, not...
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Mar 25, 2015 20:32:22 GMT -5
I'm sure Obama was "vetted" before he was allowed on the Democratic ballot as a candidate... Yes, he was asked "are you a Communist", and when he said yes, he was in like Flint. Another ridiculously false claim... you're famous for 'em...
|
|
|
Post by rocketwolf on Mar 26, 2015 7:41:32 GMT -5
The OP seems to really dislike politicans and business of all stripes, but seems to reserve special scorn for Repubs. His list seems to run in this order in dislikes 1 Religion 2 Repubs 3 Corporations 4 Dems 5 any other business As the stupid lion on TV says, Just my 2 cents Wow. You got all that from a comical post about a man who didn't plan ahead? I got it from your long past history of posts and threads here, anyone that can read will probably agree with the list all or in part.
|
|
|
Post by Evil Yoda on Mar 26, 2015 8:54:02 GMT -5
Wow. You got all that from a comical post about a man who didn't plan ahead? I got it from your long past history of posts and threads here, anyone that can read will probably agree with the list all or in part. And you felt it appropriate to make the thread about me, and not its subject? Why not instead defend Ted Cruz' apparent inability to plan ahead, or hire people who can?
|
|