Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2015 8:03:34 GMT -5
Okay, so, back to the subject. This guy was a racist, and mentally unbalanced. So, since he didn't have any 'official' problems, no arrests, no mental health warnings, exactly how should he have been "prevented" from getting a firearm? Apparently he bought the firearm legally. Careful. You're making the argument for banning everyone from having firearms since there's apparently no why to tell who is going to lose their marbles.
|
|
|
Post by Ravenchamp on Aug 31, 2015 8:08:16 GMT -5
Once we start addressing the real problem which are people and not tools, then we'll show intelligence
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2015 9:46:18 GMT -5
Okay, so, back to the subject. This guy was a racist, and mentally unbalanced. So, since he didn't have any 'official' problems, no arrests, no mental health warnings, exactly how should he have been "prevented" from getting a firearm? Apparently he bought the firearm legally. Are you kidding me? You say "Okay, so, back to the subject" and then instantly revert to making it a gun thread. You're fecking unbelievable, you really are.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Aug 31, 2015 11:03:51 GMT -5
Okay, so, back to the subject. This guy was a racist, and mentally unbalanced. So, since he didn't have any 'official' problems, no arrests, no mental health warnings, exactly how should he have been "prevented" from getting a firearm? Apparently he bought the firearm legally. Are you kidding me? You say "Okay, so, back to the subject" and then instantly revert to making it a gun thread. You're fecking unbelievable, you really are. No, I'm not. The murderer is a part of the subject of this thread. And since the screams for "gun control" are coming from the crazies and the mindless again, it is also a part of this thread. Given that he used a firearm in the commission of his crime, the tool has become the focus. How do you separate him from the rest of this thread?
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Aug 31, 2015 11:05:00 GMT -5
Okay, so, back to the subject. This guy was a racist, and mentally unbalanced. So, since he didn't have any 'official' problems, no arrests, no mental health warnings, exactly how should he have been "prevented" from getting a firearm? Apparently he bought the firearm legally. Careful. You're making the argument for banning everyone from having firearms since there's apparently no why to tell who is going to lose their marbles. Or arming everyone, since that is the only way to protect one's self from the crazies. Notice that these things happen only where firearms are banned.
|
|