|
Post by bobloblaw on Nov 26, 2017 13:46:25 GMT -5
They've always had the "Blame the victim" attitudes.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Nov 26, 2017 14:39:49 GMT -5
Sure, post some left wing propaganda to further prove my point. Weinstein, Spacey, Tambor, Franken, Weiner, Conyers, Menendez and Clinton are all proof that the Left has a much bigger problem with women than the GOP. As for “silencing women” that’s a load of crap. Some women, however, are liars. These cases have to be taken on an individual basis. As noted previously, rape is probably the most falsely reported crime. 8% of rape accusations are false. The rate for other major crimes is 2%.
|
|
|
Post by bobloblaw on Nov 26, 2017 14:48:01 GMT -5
In Donald's trump's case he has 19+ accusers. Do you think all of them are lying? That's ludicrous.
|
|
|
Post by bobloblaw on Nov 26, 2017 15:03:49 GMT -5
All I know is Imma lying. That's all I know how to do.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Nov 26, 2017 17:44:03 GMT -5
In Donald's trump's case he has 19+ accusers. Do you think all of them are lying? That's ludicrous. There were thousands of pussy-hat wearing harpies on the mall right after his inauguration. I'm surprised more haven't been claiming rape. I linked you to the accusations. Ivanna has gone from claiming rape, to claiming nothing happened. More than one of the other accusers have been contradicted by eyewitnesses. Lots of people are obviously willing to make up lies about him. Liberals fabricate these accusations as weapons as a matter of course.
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Nov 26, 2017 20:20:44 GMT -5
Sure, post some left wing propaganda to further prove my point. Weinstein, Spacey, Tambor, Franken, Weiner, Conyers, Menendez and Clinton are all proof that the Left has a much bigger problem with women than the GOP. As for “silencing women” that’s a load of crap. Some women, however, are liars. These cases have to be taken on an individual basis. As noted previously, rape is probably the most falsely reported crime. 8% of rape accusations are false. The rate for other major crimes is 2%. In other words, RJ, because this article appeared in the Huffington Post, you completely disregard it. You might like to learn that the writer used to be an editor or assistant editor for the Wall Street Journal, a very respected CONSERVATIVE newspaper. What part(s) of the article do you deny or disagree with? Or is it that the content is fine but it disagrees with your biased viewpoint, so you have to deny the entire article because it appears in a "liberal" publication? 8% of rape allegations are false claims. That means that 92% are valid. If 19 women claim that Trump abused them, then 17 of those claims are valid. That's 12 of the 14 that accused Moore. However, since your convinced that all of these women are all liberals, they must be all reporting false claims. That's how you silence women. That's how you and Trump and Moore and Hannity and Limbaugh and Fox and Briebart and the rest of the alt-white white supremacist male cliques try to maintain their tenuous holds on power.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Nov 27, 2017 7:53:26 GMT -5
Sure, post some left wing propaganda to further prove my point. Weinstein, Spacey, Tambor, Franken, Weiner, Conyers, Menendez and Clinton are all proof that the Left has a much bigger problem with women than the GOP. As for “silencing women” that’s a load of crap. Some women, however, are liars. These cases have to be taken on an individual basis. As noted previously, rape is probably the most falsely reported crime. 8% of rape accusations are falsshoulde. The rate for other major crimes is 2%. In other words, RJ, because this article appeared in the Huffington Post, you completely disregard it. You might like to learn that the writer used to be an editor or assistant editor for the Wall Street Journal, a very respected CONSERVATIVE newspaper. What part(s) of the article do you deny or disagree with? Or is it that the content is fine but it disagrees with your biased viewpoint, so you have to deny the entire article because it appears in a "liberal" publication? Nope. Doesn't interest me at all. For the same reason I don't usually open bobloblaw's palmerreport links. See? This is exactly the problem. Liberals just can't help calling anyone who disagrees with them racists, rapists, harasssers... Whatever they think will stick. Even if they have never met the person they're accusing. You're doing it here to me. Tons more are doing it to Trump. Until you a-holes wise up and realise screeching "rape!" or "racist!" at anyone and everyone who doesn't see the world the way you do, you're going to continue to prove redleg right, and loose the last tattered shreds of credibility you have. You're an idiot, palealeman. You continue to exemplify exactly the sort of behavior that calls into question all of the accusations against Trump, and you are unable to stop yourself.
|
|
|
Post by winston on Nov 27, 2017 8:31:59 GMT -5
Sure, post some left wing propaganda to further prove my point. Weinstein, Spacey, Tambor, Franken, Weiner, Conyers, Menendez and Clinton are all proof that the Left has a much bigger problem with women than the GOP. As for “silencing women” that’s a load of crap. Some women, however, are liars. These cases have to be taken on an individual basis. As noted previously, rape is probably the most falsely reported crime. 8% of rape accusations are false. The rate for other major crimes is 2%. In other words, RJ, because this article appeared in the Huffington Post, you completely disregard it. You might like to learn that the writer used to be an editor or assistant editor for the Wall Street Journal, a very respected CONSERVATIVE newspaper. What part(s) of the article do you deny or disagree with? Or is it that the content is fine but it disagrees with your biased viewpoint, so you have to deny the entire article because it appears in a "liberal" publication? 8% of rape allegations are false claims. That means that 92% are valid. If 19 women claim that Trump abused them, then 17 of those claims are valid. That's 12 of the 14 that accused Moore. However, since your convinced that all of these women are all liberals, they must be all reporting false claims. That's how you silence women. That's how you and Trump and Moore and Hannity and Limbaugh and Fox and Briebart and the rest of the alt-white white supremacist male cliques try to maintain their tenuous holds on power. The problem is bigots like you. You are one stupid little dick mother f-u-ker
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Nov 27, 2017 9:17:55 GMT -5
In other words, RJ, because this article appeared in the Huffington Post, you completely disregard it. You might like to learn that the writer used to be an editor or assistant editor for the Wall Street Journal, a very respected CONSERVATIVE newspaper. What part(s) of the article do you deny or disagree with? Or is it that the content is fine but it disagrees with your biased viewpoint, so you have to deny the entire article because it appears in a "liberal" publication? 8% of rape allegations are false claims. That means that 92% are valid. If 19 women claim that Trump abused them, then 17 of those claims are valid. That's 12 of the 14 that accused Moore. However, since your convinced that all of these women are all liberals, they must be all reporting false claims. That's how you silence women. That's how you and Trump and Moore and Hannity and Limbaugh and Fox and Briebart and the rest of the alt-white white supremacist male cliques try to maintain their tenuous holds on power. The problem is bigots like you. You are one stupid little dick mother f-u-ker And of course, the ever-reliable Winston shows up just to further drive home my point about liberals accusing anyone and everyone who doesn’t think like them of bigotry and other disgusting things. Thanks for making my point for me yet again.
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Nov 27, 2017 9:59:48 GMT -5
Amazing, RJ. You refuse to read an article because "it doesn't interest me at all." Then you continue to press your biased, narrow viewpoint.
"Liberals can't help calling anyone who disagrees with them . . . ." Fact of the matter, RJ, is that you're saying sexual abuse is a liberal problem. Fact is that, since 1990, 45 members of Congress have been charged with sexual abuses of various sorts. Of these 45, over two-thirds -- 32 -- were Republicans. (and, to be accurate, I did not count Roy Moore, who is not in Congress). Maybe you can explain this "aberation," but I can't. Seems that sexual abuse is more of a problem on the right than the left.
See, RJ, this is what the right does. Keeps quiet. When something happens on the other side, however, watch out. All kind of name calling -- "Those women must be liberals, they must have been paid by liberals to say what they said", "Look at what those liberals are doing" -- while completely denying responsibility for more egregious issues on the other side. What's that saying? Remove the plank from you own eye before trying to remove it from your brothers?
Again, you might want to read the article about the right's war on women and degradation of women. Hard to argue intelligently about something when you refuse to do the intelligent thing and read something, whether you agree with it or not. You continue to show your bias and narrow-mindedness.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Nov 27, 2017 10:04:49 GMT -5
Amazing, RJ. You refuse to read an article because "it doesn't interest me at all." Then you continue to press your biased, narrow viewpoint. "Liberals can't help calling anyone who disagrees with them . . . ." Fact of the matter, RJ, is that you're saying sexual abuse is a liberal problem. Fact is that, since 1990, 45 members of Congress have been charged with sexual abuses of various sorts. Of these 45, over two-thirds -- 32 -- were Republicans. (and, to be accurate, I did not count Roy Moore, who is not in Congress). Maybe you can explain this "aberation," but I can't. Seems that sexual abuse is more of a problem on the right than the left. See, RJ, this is what the right does. Keeps quiet. When something happens on the other side, however, watch out. All kind of name calling -- "Those women must be liberals, they must have been paid by liberals to say what they said", "Look at what those liberals are doing" -- while completely denying responsibility for more egregious issues on the other side. What's that saying? Remove the plank from you own eye before trying to remove it from your brothers? Again, you might want to read the article about the right's war on women and degradation of women. Hard to argue intelligently about something when you refuse to do the intelligent thing and read something, whether you agree with it or not. You continue to show your bias and narrow-mindedness. Sorry, PAM, none of this means anything coming from someone who so eagerly throws around baseless accusations. This is simply what Democrats do to their political enemies. It has little to do with reality.
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Nov 27, 2017 10:18:46 GMT -5
Sorry, RJ, once again you refuse to accept facts. Nothing new -- you and the Commie do it all the time. If you disagree with a fact, you just ignore it.
When you deal with facts and discuss them, let me know. Otherwise, I'm going to do with you and your unintelligible drivel what I do with the commie's -- ignore it completely because it's totally useless and without any point.
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Nov 27, 2017 10:20:04 GMT -5
Deplorables, Palealeman, deplorables... if it weren't for them people like Trump and Moore wouldn't have a chance...
Unfortunately, here in the South... my home... I am surrounded by ignorant deplorables... and they are determined to stay that way...
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Nov 27, 2017 10:24:03 GMT -5
Sorry, RJ, once again you refuse to accept facts. Nothing new -- you and the Commie do it all the time. If you disagree with a fact, you just ignore it. When you deal with facts and discuss them, let me know. Otherwise, I'm going to do with you and your unintelligible drivel what I do with the commie's -- ignore it completely because it's totally useless and without any point. What “facts?” Accusations are not facts, and Democrats make them for political gain. You’ve done it. That’s all Winston and bobloblaw ever do, and your former presidential candidate probably killed her campaign calling people deplorable.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Nov 27, 2017 10:26:03 GMT -5
Deplorables, Palealeman, deplorables... if it weren't for them people like Trump and Moore wouldn't have a chance... Unfortunately, here in the South... my home... I am surrounded by ignorant deplorables... and they are determined to stay that way... DUDE! You still believe Crystal Mangum was raped by the Duke Lacrosse team.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Nov 27, 2017 10:41:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Nov 27, 2017 10:44:13 GMT -5
Funny, but Moore is "accused" by a druggie, drunk, and financially strapped female, dug up and paid by WaPo, and he has to go, but Franken and Conyers, one of which has photographic evidence of his assault, and Conyers, who now has over 30 women accusing him, well, they are "too important" to the Communist agenda to bother with little things like sexual assault. So they stay, and are protected by the Party of the KKK. So, now they are also the Party of the Rapists.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Nov 27, 2017 10:47:22 GMT -5
You use huffingtonpuffington post to bolster your non argument? Really? When they have admitted that they are willing, anxious, to do anything, say anything to get at Trump? When Arianna herself dismisses Franken's assault by saying "well, he's a friend, so it's okay"? Really? No wonder you vote Party of the KKK/Rapists.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Nov 27, 2017 10:48:33 GMT -5
In Donald's trump's case he has 19+ accusers. Do you think all of them are lying? That's ludicrous. Most are paid prostitutes for the Party of the KKK/Rapists. The rest see deep pockets, and an atmosphere of hatred for men in general, and successful men in particular, and decided to roll the dice.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Nov 27, 2017 10:52:09 GMT -5
Sure, post some left wing propaganda to further prove my point. Weinstein, Spacey, Tambor, Franken, Weiner, Conyers, Menendez and Clinton are all proof that the Left has a much bigger problem with women than the GOP. As for “silencing women” that’s a load of crap. Some women, however, are liars. These cases have to be taken on an individual basis. As noted previously, rape is probably the most falsely reported crime. 8% of rape accusations are false. The rate for other major crimes is 2%. In other words, RJ, because this article appeared in the Huffington Post, you completely disregard it. You might like to learn that the writer used to be an editor or assistant editor for the Wall Street Journal, a very respected CONSERVATIVE newspaper. What part(s) of the article do you deny or disagree with? Or is it that the content is fine but it disagrees with your biased viewpoint, so you have to deny the entire article because it appears in a "liberal" publication? 8% of rape allegations are false claims. That means that 92% are valid. If 19 women claim that Trump abused them, then 17 of those claims are valid. That's 12 of the 14 that accused Moore. However, since your convinced that all of these women are all liberals, they must be all reporting false claims. That's how you silence women. That's how you and Trump and Moore and Hannity and Limbaugh and Fox and Briebart and the rest of the alt-white white supremacist male cliques try to maintain their tenuous holds on power. And no longer is. Did he leave because he "couldn't handle" reality, and moved to a Communist propaganda site? Was he fired for lying in his articles, like so many from WaPo and NYT? Huffingtonpuffington post only shows articles that reveal the truth by accident. They are part of the fake news owned by the DNC. If they are Leftists, they are lying by definition. Just like the 10 or 12 women that accused Cain, then disappeared the second he dropped out of the race. The Party of the KKK can't abide a black man that doesn't subjugate himself to their demands, and isn't owned by the masters in the Party of the KKK.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Nov 27, 2017 10:58:34 GMT -5
Amazing, RJ. You refuse to read an article because "it doesn't interest me at all." Then you continue to press your biased, narrow viewpoint. "Liberals can't help calling anyone who disagrees with them . . . ." Fact of the matter, RJ, is that you're saying sexual abuse is a liberal problem. Fact is that, since 1990, 45 members of Congress have been charged with sexual abuses of various sorts. Of these 45, over two-thirds -- 32 -- were Republicans. (and, to be accurate, I did not count Roy Moore, who is not in Congress). Maybe you can explain this "aberation," but I can't. Seems that sexual abuse is more of a problem on the right than the left. See, RJ, this is what the right does. Keeps quiet. When something happens on the other side, however, watch out. All kind of name calling -- "Those women must be liberals, they must have been paid by liberals to say what they said", "Look at what those liberals are doing" -- while completely denying responsibility for more egregious issues on the other side. What's that saying? Remove the plank from you own eye before trying to remove it from your brothers? Again, you might want to read the article about the right's war on women and degradation of women. Hard to argue intelligently about something when you refuse to do the intelligent thing and read something, whether you agree with it or not. You continue to show your bias and narrow-mindedness. It is. The Hollywood cesspool was covered up for 30 years or more, until Trump made it a requirement to out all the depraved details, just so they could make their scurrilous accusations against Trump. None of the perverts, prostitutes and criminals in the Party of the KKK are calling for Conyers to resign, or Franken either. They just want to impeach Trump, whether they have cause or not. They are dragging $50 bills through trailer parks to find any female willing to be paid to accuse a Pub of something nefarious. No proof, all they need is the accusation, and the Party of the KKK's Goebbels wing with handle the rest. There is no "war on women" from the Right, that's just more lying to cover the fact that the Party of the KKK sees women as nothing more than a vote, and something to play with when they are bored. Just look at the "women" they put up as "leaders". Waters, considered the most corrupt member of Congress, too stupid to write her own name without a staff to hold her hand. Pelosi, too stupid to even read the bills she insists we "HAVE TO HAVE" to give her and her commissariat complete control over every citizen. The "women" in the Party of the KKK are all too corrupt to trust if they say the sky is blue.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Nov 27, 2017 10:59:24 GMT -5
Sorry, RJ, once again you refuse to accept facts. Nothing new -- you and the Commie do it all the time. If you disagree with a fact, you just ignore it. When you deal with facts and discuss them, let me know. Otherwise, I'm going to do with you and your unintelligible drivel what I do with the commie's -- ignore it completely because it's totally useless and without any point. There are no "facts" that you have produced. You have linked, again, to propaganda from the Party of the KKK/Rapists.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Nov 27, 2017 11:00:52 GMT -5
Deplorables, Palealeman, deplorables... if it weren't for them people like Trump and Moore wouldn't have a chance... Unfortunately, here in the South... my home... I am surrounded by ignorant deplorables... and they are determined to stay that way... Absolutely true. Without people that think for themselves, and don't depend on government for everything they need to survive, we would have a treasonous criminal in the WH. Again. We just survived 8 years of a Muslim Communist, we didn't need The Felon.
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Nov 27, 2017 11:08:00 GMT -5
Sorry, RJ, once again you refuse to accept facts. Nothing new -- you and the Commie do it all the time. If you disagree with a fact, you just ignore it. When you deal with facts and discuss them, let me know. Otherwise, I'm going to do with you and your unintelligible drivel what I do with the commie's -- ignore it completely because it's totally useless and without any point. What “facts?” Accusations are not facts, and Democrats make them for political gain. You’ve done it. That’s all Winston and bobloblaw ever do, and your former presidential candidate probably killed her campaign calling people deplorable. You refuse to read the article about the right's continued war on women, their continued hatred of women. You did not even acknowledge the FACT that 70% of the congressmen charged with sexual offenses since 1990 are Republicans. Instead, you continue to accuse us of throwing around accusations. Sorry, Charlie, pointing out FACTS are not making accusations. Sorry you don't know the difference.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Nov 27, 2017 11:09:37 GMT -5
What “facts?” Accusations are not facts, and Democrats make them for political gain. You’ve done it. That’s all Winston and bobloblaw ever do, and your former presidential candidate probably killed her campaign calling people deplorable. You refuse to read the article about the right's continued war on %women, their continued hatred of women. You did not even acknowledge the FACT that 70% of the congressmen charged with sexual offenses since 1990 are Republicans. Instead, you continue to accuse us of throwing around accusations. Sorry, Charlie, pointing out FACTS are not making accusations. Sorry you don't know the difference. That's because there is no "war" from the Right. It's all propaganda from the Party of the KKK. You support fascists that demand absolute obedience to every whim they throw out. Thinking is a capital crime in the Party of the KKK, because that might lead to them all being lynched.
|
|