|
Post by Ranger John on Mar 13, 2018 7:13:44 GMT -5
MirrorApparently the British authorities left another 1,000 young girls to the tender mercies of Pakistani rape-jihadists for fear of being called bigots again.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Mar 13, 2018 8:58:29 GMT -5
That's what happens when Leftists gain control of government. Look at Chicago here. The murders that are ignored, because they don't fit the narrative. The cops refusing to police certain neighborhoods, because, if they have to actually shoot someone, they will be lynched, whether the shooting was justified or not. This is the goal of the Party of the KKK, and Leftists worldwide, to end Western civilization, and move us forward to the Stone Age.
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Mar 13, 2018 10:16:26 GMT -5
MirrorApparently the British authorities left another 1,000 young girls to the tender mercies of Pakistani rape-jihadists for fear of being called bigots again. Interesting summary you provide, RJ. In just a few words you completely distort an article to make the incident sound so much worse than the reality. But that's what happens when unthinking partisans distort everything to try to further their alt-right, totalitarian agenda.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Mar 13, 2018 14:55:51 GMT -5
MirrorApparently the British authorities left another 1,000 young girls to the tender mercies of Pakistani rape-jihadists for fear of being called bigots again. Interesting summary you provide, RJ. In just a few words you completely distort an article to make the incident sound so much worse than the reality. But that's what happens when unthinking partisans distort everything to try to further their alt-right, totalitarian agenda. As many as 1,000 young girls, as young as 11, were abused by this gang, and somehow I've made it sound WORSE than it is?
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Mar 13, 2018 16:27:11 GMT -5
Yep, you have.
You said, ". . . left another 1,000 young girls . . . ." According to the article, as many as 1,000. There's a bit of a difference, wouldn't you agree?
You refer to Pakistani rape-jihadists. I've read the article 3 or 4 times, but don't see either word there. I did see Asian referring to these gang members. Of course, since the alt-right xenophobia doesn't necessarily extend to Buddhists or Hindus, let's make sure they're all from Pakistan or some other Muslim country.
And you make it sound like this activity has been going on with no police activity. However, the article notes that the police have investigated several cases and several perps have been incarcerated.
It's a tragic situation. It's something that should not have happened and should not be happening. But to try to make it a political issue to denigrate a particular ethnic group and the British police is going a bit too far, even for you.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Mar 13, 2018 17:07:05 GMT -5
Yep, you have. You said, ". . . left another 1,000 young girls . . . ." According to the article, as many as 1,000. There's a bit of a difference, wouldn't you agree? Not enough to matter, unless you’re trying to make excuses for rape, and/or islamofascism. The English call Pakistanis “south Asians” because they are too politically correct. These people are not Buddhists or Hindus, and again, you have no point unless you’re trying to make excuses for islamofascism. The article states that this has been going on since the 1980s in Telford. If the police are just making arrests now, my point stands. Again, the facts speak for themselves, unless you’re trying to excuse rape or islamofascism.
|
|
|
Post by breakingbad on Mar 14, 2018 5:31:49 GMT -5
You refer to Pakistani rape-jihadists. I've read the article 3 or 4 times, but don't see either word there. I did see Asian referring to these gang members. Of course, since the alt-right xenophobia doesn't necessarily extend to Buddhists or Hindus, let's make sure they're all from Pakistan or some other Muslim country. Funny how you accuse RJ of ignorance, but are perfectly willing to accept a PC article branding Mohammed Ali Sultan and Shahmeel Khan as Asian. They are as Asian as you. You have zero credibility when you continually bend over backwards to defend the Alt-Left.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Mar 14, 2018 7:27:10 GMT -5
You refer to Pakistani rape-jihadists. I've read the article 3 or 4 times, but don't see either word there. I did see Asian referring to these gang members. Of course, since the alt-right xenophobia doesn't necessarily extend to Buddhists or Hindus, let's make sure they're all from Pakistan or some other Muslim country. Funny how you accuse RJ of ignorance, but are perfectly willing to accept a PC article branding Mohammed Ali Sultan and Shahmeel Khan as Asian. They are as Asian as you. You have zero credibility when you continually bend over backwards to defend the Alt-Left. There isn't an "alt-left." This nonsense is just normal-left. They're hanging out with Louis Farrakhan like he's normal, and made former NOI member Keith Ellison deputy chair of the DNC.
|
|
|
Post by breakingbad on Mar 14, 2018 7:35:33 GMT -5
Funny how you accuse RJ of ignorance, but are perfectly willing to accept a PC article branding Mohammed Ali Sultan and Shahmeel Khan as Asian. They are as Asian as you. You have zero credibility when you continually bend over backwards to defend the Alt-Left. There isn't an "alt-left." This nonsense is just normal-left. They're hanging out with Louis Farrakhan like he's normal, and made former NOI member Keith Ellison deputy chair of the DNC. OK. Instead of Alt-left we can call them Asian-left.
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Mar 14, 2018 8:15:43 GMT -5
If you ever did any research, BB and RJ, you'd know that, when the British use the term "Asian" or "South Asia," they are referring to the Indian sub-continent -- Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, Sri Lanka. But why would I expect you to do any research when you can continue to live in your unthinking, blind partisanship?
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Mar 14, 2018 8:39:39 GMT -5
If you ever did any research, BB and RJ, you'd know that, when the British use the term "Asian" or "South Asia," they are referring to the Indian sub-continent -- Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, Sri Lanka. But why would I expect you to do any research when you can continue to live in your unthinking, blind partisanship? BB explained the core problem with your thinking when he listed the names of the people involved.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Mar 14, 2018 8:45:38 GMT -5
There isn't an "alt-left." This nonsense is just normal-left. They're hanging out with Louis Farrakhan like he's normal, and made former NOI member Keith Ellison deputy chair of the DNC. OK. Instead of Alt-left we can call them Asian-left. I say we just call them Democrats. These hyper-PC lunatics are the core of the party. There's no analog to the alt-right, which isn't conservative (hence the name: alternative to the right). The alt-right isn't the core of the GOP. They simply made common cause with Trump, because the Democrats blatantly and overtly despise them. Even if the alt-right share their support of big-government socialism and raging anti-Semitism with core Democrats like Keith Ellison.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Mar 14, 2018 9:02:39 GMT -5
Yep, you have. You said, ". . . left another 1,000 young girls . . . ." According to the article, as many as 1,000. There's a bit of a difference, wouldn't you agree? You refer to Pakistani rape-jihadists. I've read the article 3 or 4 times, but don't see either word there. I did see Asian referring to these gang members. Of course, since the alt-right xenophobia doesn't necessarily extend to Buddhists or Hindus, let's make sure they're all from Pakistan or some other Muslim country. And you make it sound like this activity has been going on with no police activity. However, the article notes that the police have investigated several cases and several perps have been incarcerated. It's a tragic situation. It's something that should not have happened and should not be happening. But to try to make it a political issue to denigrate a particular ethnic group and the British police is going a bit too far, even for you. How many Buddhists or Hindus have 'immigrated' to Britain? How many use their religion as an excuse to rape, or murder? Of course, the British "press" uses "Asian" instead of "Arab" to hide the fact that these are jihadists, who have "immigrated" to Britain to carry on jihad, and destroy Britain as a once free and powerful country. They are there to out breed Brits, and therefore gain control of the country through sheer force of numbers. And no, there is no practical difference between "1,000 young girls" and "as many as...", especially since the "media" in Britain is just as corrupted and PC as the "media" here.
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Mar 14, 2018 10:02:43 GMT -5
BB explained the core problem with your thinking when he listed the names of the people involved. In other words, RJ, you see 2 or 3 names and jump to the conclusions that: (1) they are Muslim; and (2) everyone involved in these gangs is also Muslim. Unsupported by the facts. Again, more of your completely and totally unthinking partisan bias. Why do you and your alt-right friends continue to believe that all Muslims are engaged in some sort of jihad against the world? Sounds like, in your case, ignorance really is bliss.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Mar 14, 2018 11:04:32 GMT -5
BB explained the core problem with your thinking when he listed the names of the people involved. In other words, RJ, you see 2 or 3 names and jump to the conclusions that: (1) they are Muslim; and (2) everyone involved in these gangs is also Muslim. Unsupported by the facts. Again, more of your completely and totally unthinking partisan bias. Why do you and your alt-right friends continue to believe that all Muslims are engaged in some sort of jihad against the world? Sounds like, in your case, ignorance really is bliss. If ignorance is bliss, surely you're the happiest man in the world. While I haven't studied it in depth, I'm aware of what jihad is, and that it is interpreted by many Muslims to be a call to inflict their religion on the entire world by force if necessary. I'm also aware that many Muslims consider women to be inferior to men, and non-muslim women to be little more than livestock to be raped and used as they see fit.
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Mar 14, 2018 11:40:33 GMT -5
I think you're a lot happier, RJ. And getting plenty of exercise jumping to conclusions, generally unsupported by any facts other than the facts you make up in your unthinking partisanship. Here you go again, over-generalizing everything. But, again, what else is new with you?
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Mar 14, 2018 12:27:24 GMT -5
I think you're a lot happier, RJ. And getting plenty of exercise jumping to conclusions, generally unsupported by any facts other than the facts you make up in your unthinking partisanship. Here you go again, over-generalizing everything. But, again, what else is new with you? Really? You're REALLY going to sit there and try to argue Mohammed Sultan, Mohammed Younis, and Mohammed Islam Choudrhey and all their cousins and brothers in the rape-gang might be Buddhist or Hindu? Are you REALLY SURE want to make that suggestion?
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Mar 14, 2018 16:09:53 GMT -5
So the name Mohammed can only be used by Muslims? Not the Coptic priest and his family named Mohammed? Not the Christian whom Pat Robertson told to change his name?
You look at a name and react. Expectedly, from the unthinking partisan alt-right anti-Muslim bigots. But you suppose facts not in evidence. Which is nothing new for you, RJ. Keep jumping and getting your exercise.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Mar 14, 2018 16:22:13 GMT -5
So the name Mohammed can only be used by Muslims? Not the Coptic priest and his family named Mohammed? Not the Christian whom Pat Robertson told to change his name? You look at a name and react. Expectedly, from the unthinking partisan alt-right anti-Muslim bigots. But you suppose facts not in evidence. Which is nothing new for you, RJ. Keep jumping and getting your exercise. When we're talking about a large, extended family from "south Asia" in a country that uses that term as a euphemism for Pakistan... Never mind. If you want to live in denial, and pretend that 2+2=Copts, you go ahead. The rest of us will have to figure out how to battle rape gangs, and school shooters without you. And yes, this is about the Nikolas Cruze's of the world too. He also existed in a PC world that ignored him because facing the violent reality he represented was impossible for people like you.
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Mar 14, 2018 17:31:44 GMT -5
I deny reality when you judge books by their cover? If the person looks like a Muslim, he must be a violent jihadist, right?
Admit it, RJ, you're a bigot.
And how are you going to battle shooters? You've already admitted -- numerous times -- that there's nothing that we can do other than, perhaps, strengthen background checks. You've proposed nothing. How are YOU going to fight this problem? (my guess is that you'll just keep saying there's nothing anyone can do. Hope you prove me wrong, but then I remember that you're an unthinking partisan spouting alt-right and NRA talking points, i.e., you have no credibility in this issue).
And, since you can't or won't propose anything to stop gun violence, I can't imagine what you'd try to propose to "battle rape gangs." Remember, you're the guy that hugs all the women at work, work that in many if not most work places is considered sexual harrassment.
I'm not holding my breath for any solutions from you -- you've never proposed any yet, so what's different now? Nothing.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Mar 14, 2018 19:50:07 GMT -5
BB explained the core problem with your thinking when he listed the names of the people involved. In other words, RJ, you see 2 or 3 names and jump to the conclusions that: (1) they are Muslim; and (2) everyone involved in these gangs is also Muslim. Unsupported by the facts. Again, more of your completely and totally unthinking partisan bias. Why do you and your alt-right friends continue to believe that all Muslims are engaged in some sort of jihad against the world? Sounds like, in your case, ignorance really is bliss. And you accept the fact that the "media" in Britain is doing it's PC best to hide where they came from by calling them "East Asians". As for a jihad against the world, it's because they have said they are in jihad against the world, at least the parts of it that don't bow to their particular brand of lunacy. Read the Koran sometime, and see where they get all that about raping, killing, and stealing from anyone that doesn't bow at their altar. Even if the gangs aren't Muslim, they are barbarians, that have no place in a civilized country, until they learn to at like civilized human beings.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Mar 14, 2018 19:52:05 GMT -5
So the name Mohammed can only be used by Muslims? Not the Coptic priest and his family named Mohammed? Not the Christian whom Pat Robertson told to change his name? You look at a name and react. Expectedly, from the unthinking partisan alt-right anti-Muslim bigots. But you suppose facts not in evidence. Which is nothing new for you, RJ. Keep jumping and getting your exercise. How many Christians, from anywhere, are forming gangs to rape and pillage? How many Christians have the insane lunatics that "lead" Europe even allowed in? Nearly every "refugee" they admit is a Muslim. Period. The lies won't hold, so stop trying.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Mar 14, 2018 19:56:09 GMT -5
I deny reality when you judge books by their cover? If the person looks like a Muslim, he must be a violent jihadist, right? Admit it, RJ, you're a bigot. And how are you going to battle shooters? You've already admitted -- numerous times -- that there's nothing that we can do other than, perhaps, strengthen background checks. You've proposed nothing. How are YOU going to fight this problem? (my guess is that you'll just keep saying there's nothing anyone can do. Hope you prove me wrong, but then I remember that you're an unthinking partisan spouting alt-right and NRA talking points, i.e., you have no credibility in this issue). And, since you can't or won't propose anything to stop gun violence, I can't imagine what you'd try to propose to "battle rape gangs." Remember, you're the guy that hugs all the women at work, work that in many if not most work places is considered sexual harrassment. I'm not holding my breath for any solutions from you -- you've never proposed any yet, so what's different now? Nothing. So, if someone offered you 100 M&M's, and told you that 10% were poisoned, would you eat them? Well, if they were offered by a Muslim, you probably would. However, that's exactly the situation the "refugees" present. 10% of them are more than willing to kill you and your whole family, but you want them here anyway, because you are afraid of "offending" the 90% that just wish you were dead. Or living under Shari'a. There is nothing that can be done, unless you are willing to arm the teachers, harden schools, outlaw "gun free" zones, and arrest all Democrat pols. Other than that, arming everyone around is the next best option, so that armed individuals are close by to assist when the next, inevitable shooting happens. Because you Leftists created all of the shooters, you just refuse to admit it. You want as much blood and gore as you can, because you think that gives you more opportunity to turn this country into the USSR.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Mar 14, 2018 20:01:40 GMT -5
I deny reality when you judge books by their cover? If the person looks like a Muslim, he must be a violent jihadist, right? Admit it, RJ, you're a bigot. And how are you going to battle shooters? You've already admitted -- numerous times -- that there's nothing that we can do other than, perhaps, strengthen background checks. You've proposed nothing. How are YOU going to fight this problem? (my guess is that you'll just keep saying there's nothing anyone can do. Hope you prove me wrong, but then I remember that you're an unthinking partisan spouting alt-right and NRA talking points, i.e., you have no credibility in this issue). And, since you can't or won't propose anything to stop gun violence, I can't imagine what you'd try to propose to "battle rape gangs." Remember, you're the guy that hugs all the women at work, work that in many if not most work places is considered sexual harrassment. I'm not holding my breath for any solutions from you -- you've never proposed any yet, so what's different now? Nothing. Translation: you have no sensible argument, so you do what every liberal does when he is out of options: call your opponent a bigot. There was plenty we could have done about Cruz. The police had almost 40 opportunities to stop him, but didn’t want to contribute to the school-prison pipleline, so rather than make the arrest, they ignored every red flag Cruz flew, and it resulted in an atrocity. Likewise, the police in Telford apparently needed almost 40 years to shut down the Muslim rape-gang. This is what happens when PC reality deniers prefer to live in their own private fantasy world.
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Mar 14, 2018 21:55:10 GMT -5
Translation: you have nothing to add to any discussion. You're the one who said you'd have to figure out how to battle rape gangs, what to do about people like Cruz and weapons. You still haven't proposed anything, and I'm betting you never do. Instead, you deflect and claim that I have no sensible argument when you have never had one.
I believe you said a while ago, "Put up or shut up." Follow you own advice . . . though I don't think you're capable of it. You wallow in your unthinking partisan bigotry and ignorance too much.
|
|