|
|
Post by Ranger John on Apr 21, 2018 21:03:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Apr 23, 2018 9:32:51 GMT -5
Wait til they get to investigating Waters, Pelosi, Schumer, et al, for conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and possibly sedition. They were all parties to all this abomination. Then we may get to the DNC, and their "hacking" complaints, after "employing" the Awans for years, despite their losing their certifications to access any government computers.
I think the Party of the KKK may have opened a can of worms that they never wanted exposed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Apr 23, 2018 10:30:26 GMT -5
Wait til they get to investigating Waters, Pelosi, Schumer, et al, for conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and possibly sedition. They were all parties to all this abomination. Then we may get to the DNC, and their "hacking" complaints, after "employing" the Awans for years, despite their losing their certifications to access any government computers. I think the Party of the KKK may have opened a can of worms that they never wanted exposed. That's why the DNC's new lawsuit against the Trump campaign is going to hit ludicrous in short order. Can you imagine what's going to happen when the defense demands the DNC's computers as part of discovery? |
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Apr 24, 2018 8:42:27 GMT -5
Wait til they get to investigating Waters, Pelosi, Schumer, et al, for conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and possibly sedition. They were all parties to all this abomination. Then we may get to the DNC, and their "hacking" complaints, after "employing" the Awans for years, despite their losing their certifications to access any government computers. I think the Party of the KKK may have opened a can of worms that they never wanted exposed. That's why the DNC's new lawsuit against the Trump campaign is going to hit ludicrous in short order. Can you imagine what's going to happen when the defense demands the DNC's computers as part of discovery? Well, they can always use The Felon's dodge. Bleachbit works for them, too. I don't think it will ever get to discovery, because the Party of the KKK knows they will not only lose, but might be facing serious criminal charges if their chicanery is exposed. |
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Apr 24, 2018 12:15:26 GMT -5
That's why the DNC's new lawsuit against the Trump campaign is going to hit ludicrous in short order. Can you imagine what's going to happen when the defense demands the DNC's computers as part of discovery? Well, they can always use The Felon's dodge. Bleachbit works for them, too. I don't think it will ever get to discovery, because the Party of the KKK knows they will not only lose, but might be facing serious criminal charges if their chicanery is exposed. No. They can't use that dodge. They have to be able to show hacking to make their case. If they destroyed the evidence, and don't have have a neutral third party analysis like from the FBI, a non-partisan judge laughs them out of court for lack of evidence. |
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Apr 25, 2018 8:46:53 GMT -5
They will make sure to shop it to a 'friendly' judge, that will rule in their favor before the trial even starts. The Felon had a friendly FBI and DOJ, so she didn't even have to find a judge.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Apr 25, 2018 9:28:22 GMT -5
They will make sure to shop it to a 'friendly' judge, that will rule in their favor before the trial even starts. The Felon had a friendly FBI and DOJ, so she didn't even have to find a judge. Someone like Kimba Wood probably would try to run interferance... but that can only go so far. The core of the case is this Russian hacking charge. They're going to have to show that happened. And they can't if they don't provide the computers. A summary report from their in-house IT group ain't gonna cut it. |
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Apr 25, 2018 17:00:34 GMT -5
They will make sure to shop it to a 'friendly' judge, that will rule in their favor before the trial even starts. The Felon had a friendly FBI and DOJ, so she didn't even have to find a judge. Someone like Kimba Wood probably would try to run interferance... but that can only go so far. The core of the case is this Russian hacking charge. They're going to have to show that happened. And they can't if they don't provide the computers. A summary report from their in-house IT group ain't gonna cut it. They might try. I wouldn't put it past some of these "judges" to go with it, though. |
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Apr 26, 2018 6:45:23 GMT -5
Someone like Kimba Wood probably would try to run interferance... but that can only go so far. The core of the case is this Russian hacking charge. They're going to have to show that happened. And they can't if they don't provide the computers. A summary report from their in-house IT group ain't gonna cut it. They might try. I wouldn't put it past some of these "judges" to go with it, though. It'll depend on whether they get a real judge or an Obama judge. |
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Apr 26, 2018 8:05:29 GMT -5
Always gotta blame something you don't/don't understand like... on Obama and/or Clinton...
I guess it was Obama/Clinton's fault that Lebron wasn't called for goal tending last night too...
You guys are a real hoot...
That's why nobody's here anymore...
|
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Apr 26, 2018 8:13:48 GMT -5
Always gotta blame something you don't/don't understand like... on Obama and/or Clinton... I guess it was Obama/Clinton's fault that Lebron wasn't called for goal tending last night too... You guys are a real hoot... That's why nobody's here anymore... Yes, I know. No one has a rational defense for judges like Kimba Wood, or the Obama judges who claim Trump doesn't have the authority to institute a travel ban to protect the country from jihadis, or to rescind a memo Obama wrote to implement DACA. Until someone does come up with a rational defense for Obama's fascist judges, this place probably will stay pretty quiet. Or just full of petty snark coming from the likes of you. |
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Apr 26, 2018 14:16:31 GMT -5
Ranger John... you in particular are why this forum is on it's last leg... at one time it was fairly good... then you came along...
|
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Apr 26, 2018 14:36:04 GMT -5
Ranger John... you in particular are why this forum is on it's last leg... at one time it was fairly good... then you came along... RORFLMAO! I've been here since the beginning. The reason this forum is failing is people like you, who once had the ability to argue a point (even if the argument was laughable) now only howl personal invective. Mainly, I suspect this is because you know you're wrong, but can't break out of the mental prison you've worked so hard to build. This thread is a case in point. There should be plenty of meat to sink your teeth into... defend Comey... or the corrupt judges that are mere partisan hacks... or talk about the weakness of the OIG's case. But you can't actually do any of that, because Comey is a pompous, hypocritical a-hole who lied at least as much as Flynn did, and the leftist judges involved have an obvious partisan double standard, and the OIG's case is rock solid. Your participation here is a perfect example of the old attorney's joke: "If the facts are on your side, pound the facts. If the law is on your side, pound the law. If neither is on your side, pound the table." You've been pounding the table here, and on the old Sun forums for at least 15 years. |
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Apr 26, 2018 16:18:00 GMT -5
Actually, RJ, it's because you and your commie buddy are prime examples of Hanson's Law -- and since everything after that is blather, why bother? You've lost all credibility at that point. You don't argue, you call people names and try to demean the other side. Hanson's Law -- prime examples in almost everything you two post.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Apr 26, 2018 16:19:43 GMT -5
Actually, RJ, it's because you and your commie buddy are prime examples of Hanson's Law -- and since everything after that is blather, why bother? You've lost all credibility at that point. You don't argue, you call people names and try to demean the other side. Hanson's Law -- prime examples in almost everything you two post. Yep.. just in time to pound the table yourself. |
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Apr 26, 2018 16:23:40 GMT -5
As expected -- no attempt to refute or rebut, just attack the messenger. Thanks for continuing to prove my point.
|
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Apr 26, 2018 17:10:58 GMT -5
Ranger John... you in particular are why this forum is on it's last leg... at one time it was fairly good... then you came along... RORFLMAO! I've been here since the beginning. The reason this forum is failing is people like you, who once had the ability to argue a point (even if the argument was laughable) now only howl personal invective. Mainly, I suspect this is because you know you're wrong, but can't break out of the mental prison you've worked so hard to build. This thread is a case in point. There should be plenty of meat to sink your teeth into... defend Comey... or the corrupt judges that are mere partisan hacks... or talk about the weakness of the OIG's case. But you can't actually do any of that, because Comey is a pompous, hypocritical a-hole who lied at least as much as Flynn did, and the leftist judges involved have an obvious partisan double standard, and the OIG's case is rock solid. Your participation here is a perfect example of the old attorney's joke: "If the facts are on your side, pound the facts. If the law is on your side, pound the law. If neither is on your side, pound the table." You've been pounding the table here, and on the old Sun forums for at least 15 years. Figuratively, not literally, Ranger John... and speaking for myself, you are the reason I am not here... you have zero respect for anyone else or the truth... I have been active on talk forums for 30 years now and haven't changed a bit... am still on more than one every day... providing the truth when I can find it and offering very few opinions... you, on the other hand, do neither... you can't handle the truth... look how many were here and how many are left... find a mirror and thank yourself... |
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Apr 26, 2018 17:18:17 GMT -5
As expected -- no attempt to refute or rebut, just attack the messenger. Thanks for continuing to prove my point. You didn't post anything to refute or rebut. You just posted a personal attack and accused me of name calling. Which is pretty much what we all figured you and aboutwell would do. It's all you ever do. It's all the left ever does. It's what you all do with Trump too. Here's a hint: calling him a racist and a Nazi might have been more effective if you hadn't done the same with every Republican since Gerald Ford. |
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Apr 26, 2018 17:53:33 GMT -5
So you accept that what you.post is all prime examples oh Hanson's Law. Thank you for agreeing. One of the few times I can ever remember you being truthful.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Apr 26, 2018 18:41:37 GMT -5
So you accept that what you.post is all prime examples oh Hanson's Law. Thank you for agreeing. One of the few times I can ever remember you being truthful. Hansen’s Law: www.quora.com/What-is-Hansens-law“What the second generation wants to forget, the third generation wants to remember.” It’s about immigrants. I have NO IDEA how it applies to this discussion, save as yet another example of you not having a clue about what you’re talking about, and resorting to personal attacks because of it. If you meant Hanlon’s Razor, which says “never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity,” you’re going to have to stop calling people bigots before anyone will take you seriously on that. |
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Apr 26, 2018 20:07:13 GMT -5
Actually, RJ, it's because you and your commie buddy are prime examples of Hanson's Law -- and since everything after that is blather, why bother? You've lost all credibility at that point. You don't argue, you call people names and try to demean the other side. Hanson's Law -- prime examples in almost everything you two post. Yep.. just in time to pound the table yourself. Since he has no idea what we are talking about, and wouldn't know judicial misconduct if it bit him, he has someone mention "Hanson's law", so he decides to try it out for himself. |
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Apr 26, 2018 20:09:13 GMT -5
So you accept that what you.post is all prime examples oh Hanson's Law. Thank you for agreeing. One of the few times I can ever remember you being truthful. Hansen’s Law: www.quora.com/What-is-Hansens-law“What the second generation wants to forget, the third generation wants to remember.” It’s about immigrants. I have NO IDEA how it applies to this discussion, save as yet another example of you not having a clue about what you’re talking about, and resorting to personal attacks because of it. If you meant Hanlon’s Razor, which says “never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity,” you’re going to have to stop calling people bigots before anyone will take you seriously on that. As I said, he heard someone mention Hanson's law, and thought he could use it to sound cognizant. |
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Apr 26, 2018 20:26:41 GMT -5
Please, RJ, learn to read and spell. H A N S O N. Hanson's Law. Not Hansen's. Ron Hansen played for the Orioles and a couple other teams in his baseball career. There's also a novelist named Ron Hansen. But I'm talking Hanson.
Again, reading is fundamental. You still have problems with reading and comprehenson. Hope it clears up soon, but I doubt we'll see any improvement.
Really a sorry state of affairs that two so-called literate adults can't read and spell correctly.
|
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Apr 26, 2018 20:29:18 GMT -5
Yep.. just in time to pound the table yourself. Since he has no idea what we are talking about, and wouldn't know judicial misconduct if it bit him, he has someone mention "Hanson's law", so he decides to try it out for himself. Can't ignore you this time, idiot. HANSON's law. With an O, not an E. Please learn to read, though I doubt you ever will. Judicial misconduct? I worked for a court system. I understand Judicial misconduct. Have you ever had a job? You've never mentioned any, so I'm guessing not. Another one of our "entitled" people continuing to live off welfare and SNAP? |
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Apr 26, 2018 20:42:27 GMT -5
Please, RJ, learn to read and spell. H A N S O N. Hanson's Law. Not Hansen's. Ron Hansen played for the Orioles and a couple other teams in his baseball career. There's also a novelist named Ron Hansen. But I'm talking Hanson. Again, reading is fundamental. You still have problems with reading and comprehenson. Hope it clears up soon, but I doubt we'll see any improvement. Really a sorry state of affairs that two so-called literate adults can't read and spell correctly. Sorry no. “Hanson’s Law” isn’t an actual thing. Hansen’s Law is, and Hanlon’s Razor is. Hanson’s Law is not. “Hanson’s Law” is just slang, and exists only at the Urban Dictionary which defines it thusly: I realize you think you can discredit anyone who uses the term “liberal” or any variation thereof just for using the word “liberal.” But that would be so asinine that not even you could really, seriously believe such nonsense. |
|
