|
Post by Ranger John on Jun 1, 2018 10:18:06 GMT -5
Earlier this week liberal whack-job and racist Roseanne Barr (she ran for president on the Green Party ticket before getting behind Trump) compared Valerie Jarrett to the Muslim Brotherhood and the Planet of the Apes. This was a stupid, ignorant thing to do, and ABC understandably cancelled her show.
Then liberal whack-job and anti-semite Samantha Bee suggested Ivanka Trump make a pass at her own father and called her a "feckless cu*t" and liberal whack-job Sally Field doubled down. But this was ok for the media because the target of their hate is Ivanka Trump.
Way to go lefties... just keep letting your hate-flags fly.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Jun 1, 2018 16:26:06 GMT -5
They also "promoted" Olbermann on ESPN. Talk about a bigot and hate monger. But it's ok, because he's bigoted against the "correct" people, and hates the "correct" country.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Jun 1, 2018 17:05:00 GMT -5
They also "promoted" Olbermann on ESPN. Talk about a bigot and hate monger. But it's ok, because he's bigoted against the "correct" people, and hates the "correct" country. And yet the media keeps wondering why everyone is tuning them out. Then again, that's probably what got Roseanne in trouble to start with. Being a leftist, she's used to being protected the way Bee and Joy Reid are. This is what it is mainly because of her recent pro-Trump heresy.
|
|
|
Post by breakingbad on Jun 2, 2018 11:35:03 GMT -5
I had no idea who Samantha Bee was prior to this publicity stunt. So it obviously worked out for her. Just like that kook Michele Wolf.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Jun 2, 2018 11:41:05 GMT -5
I had no idea who Samantha Bee was prior to this publicity stunt. So it obviously worked out for her. Just like that kook Michele Wolf. Which is the entire point of doing it. Of course, since bakers, photographers, and other businesses can be shut down for "discrimination", why can't we shut down NBC, CBS, and ABC for the same thing? Or TBS or whatever other propaganda sites fire an employee for thought crimes, but defend and support other employees for arguably far worse?
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Jun 2, 2018 11:46:38 GMT -5
I had no idea who Samantha Bee was prior to this publicity stunt. So it obviously worked out for her. Just like that kook Michele Wolf. Which is the entire point of doing it. Of course, since bakers, photographers, and other businesses can be shut down for "discrimination", why can't we shut down NBC, CBS, and ABC for the same thing? Or TBS or whatever other propaganda sites fire an employee for thought crimes, but defend and support other employees for arguably far worse? US broadcast media caters almost exclusively to the left. No one else is watching. Which is why breakingbad didn't know who Samantha Bee and Michelle Wolf are. TBH, I had never seen their shows either, I had only heard of them. Didn't really watch Roseanne either. She has always been a screw up. In some ways the purpose of her show is to mock the working class.
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Jun 2, 2018 15:55:10 GMT -5
I'd hardly call Roseanne a liberal, RJ. Maybe years ago, but not today.
I find it interesting that the failing president made no comment about her comments. Goes to prove (again) that he's OK with racism and white supremacy.
As for Ms. Bee, her mistake was using a word that appeared on many a tee-shirt at a Trump rally during his run . . . a word that he never mentioned or implied any disagreement with. Since it appears that he's OK with the word, I'd guess you unthinking partisans should be too.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Jun 2, 2018 16:38:25 GMT -5
I'd hardly call Roseanne a liberal, RJ. Maybe years ago, but not today. I find it interesting that the failing president made no comment about her comments. Goes to prove (again) that he's OK with racism and white supremacy. As for Ms. Bee, her mistake was using a word that appeared on many a tee-shirt at a Trump rally during his run . . . a word that he never mentioned or implied any disagreement with. Since it appears that he's OK with the word, I'd guess you unthinking partisans should be too. Since you get no information from other than Communist propaganda sites, you wouldn't know that "the word" is not the problem. It's the implication that Trump is in an incestuous relationship with his daughter. Given that he's not a Party of the KKK commissar, that's not very likely. Schumer, Pelosi, "Auntie Maxipad", all of them would be probable, but not Trump. In addition, the idea that he should comment on each and every T shirt worn by each and every attendee to all of his rallies is simply evidence of insanity. He's not The Felon, so he had far more than 10 people, all paid, attend his rallies.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Jun 2, 2018 17:45:48 GMT -5
I'd hardly call Roseanne a liberal, RJ. Maybe years ago, but not today. She ran for president on the Green Party ticket, then the Peace and Freedom Party ticket with Cindy Sheehan as her VP. What more proof could there be? Why would Trump comment on Barr's comments? She isn't a member of his administration or family. He has more important things to do, and had literally NOTHING to do with this until Bee opened her hate-hole and unloaded on his daughter.
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Jun 2, 2018 20:07:13 GMT -5
Given your history and your propensity to lie and accept lies as truth, RJ, I don't think I can accept anything you say as true. All I see is more of your unthinking partisan rambling.
And the failing president did make comments about Barr's firing, but actually turned them around to make them about himself. As usual.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Jun 2, 2018 20:22:26 GMT -5
Given your history and your propensity to lie and accept lies as truth, RJ, I don't think I can accept anything you say as true. All I see is more of your unthinking partisan rambling. You don’t believe Barr ran as a Green Party candidate, and then with Cindy Sheehan? It became about him when Bee called hs daughter a cu*t, and suggested that she try to seduce him.
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Jun 2, 2018 23:55:05 GMT -5
Samantha Bee's comments were made on her comedy show... and we all know most any and everything is said on comedy shows these days... because it's entertainment and comedy... but, Roseanne's comments were not made on a comedy show... they were made by her personally off her comedy show... in a personal attack on Jarrett... big difference...
And BTW... calling someone an ape... just because their skin is a little darker than yours is a serious thing... referring to someone as a feckless c*nt is figurative... and simply a non-flattering comment... after all, what the hell is a "feckless c*nt anyway?"...
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Jun 3, 2018 6:59:34 GMT -5
Samantha Bee's comments were made on her comedy show... and we all know most any and everything is said on comedy shows these days... because it's entertainment and comedy... but, Roseanne's comments were not made on a comedy show... they were made by her personally off her comedy show... in a personal attack on Jarrett... big difference... Yes, a big difference indeed. Bee's comments were planned, thought out, scripted into her show, and deliberately broadcast by a network. That's malice aforethought by Bee, her crew, and the network. This isn't to excuse Barr, but by comparison, she just spewed her ugliness off the cuff on Twitter (possibly while stoned). She didn't have a filter that could have stopped her the way Bee's should have. Again, no arguement Barr's comment was unacceptable. However, had Bee's comments (which imply incest, not just gratuitous use of "cu*t") been made by Sean Hannity and directed at Sasha Obama, the left and right would both be howling about how unacceptable they were. What makes them acceptable to you and the left is their target is Ivanka Trump.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Jun 3, 2018 8:09:52 GMT -5
Given your history and your propensity to lie and accept lies as truth, RJ, I don't think I can accept anything you say as true. All I see is more of your unthinking partisan rambling. And the failing president did make comments about Barr's firing, but actually turned them around to make them about himself. As usual. No, he simply pointed out the massive hypocrisy of the Left, and the LR media. The Communists can say or do anything they want, and simply issue a non apology and everything is fine. Joy Reid for example. Let anyone say anything at all positive about Trump, or tell the truth about The Puppet, and they have to be run out of town for a rail. That's because they have no policy that they can tell the truth about, and no arguments except 'Trump bad, Communism good'. That's why the LR media is doing it's best to hide the good things that Trump is doing, and has done.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Jun 3, 2018 8:20:40 GMT -5
Samantha Bee's comments were made on her comedy show... and we all know most any and everything is said on comedy shows these days... because it's entertainment and comedy... but, Roseanne's comments were not made on a comedy show... they were made by her personally off her comedy show... in a personal attack on Jarrett... big difference... And BTW... calling someone an ape... just because their skin is a little darker than yours is a serious thing... referring to someone as a feckless c*nt is figurative... and simply a non-flattering comment... after all, what the hell is a "feckless c*nt anyway?"... Sorry, no. Bee's screed was made, scripted, reviewed, and telepromptered, and wasn't comedy. The only things allowed on "comedy" shows are attacks on Trump or his family, or lies about the Pubs. Any "comedian" that says anything about The Puppet, or for Trump, is run out of town, has his family attacked, and is blacklisted from ever working in his line again. It's simply censorship in the digital age. Since the Left has no ideas that they can discuss in public, no morals, and no idea what they are doing, they have to silence anyone that disagrees with them. Not challenge their arguments, not debate them, because they would lose, and lose badly, but silence. On the other hand, anyone that they agree with has to be lauded, regardless of how obscene, disgusting, or irrational they are. As for comparing someone to an ape, how many times was Bush called "the Chimp"? What you are claiming is that it's okay coming from a brainless, no talent moron, but coming from anyone that's right of Lenin, it's a crime. And the real argument against Bee's stupidity is not the "feckless c*nt", but the fact that she was implying an incestuous relationship in the Trump family. Ask yourself what would have happened if anyone, anywhere had said the same thing about one of The Puppet's daughter? The fact that Jarrett is a terrorist supporter, and is tied to the Muslim Brotherhood opens her up to insults far more than anything Trump has done. As for "what is a feckless c*nt" anyway, see Samantha Bee.
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Jun 3, 2018 12:49:27 GMT -5
Samantha Bee's comments were made on her comedy show... and we all know most any and everything is said on comedy shows these days... because it's entertainment and comedy... but, Roseanne's comments were not made on a comedy show... they were made by her personally off her comedy show... in a personal attack on Jarrett... big difference... Yes, a big difference indeed. Bee's comments were planned, thought out, scripted into her show, and deliberately broadcast by a network. That's malice aforethought by Bee, her crew, and the network. This isn't to excuse Barr, but by comparison, she just spewed her ugliness off the cuff on Twitter (possibly while stoned). She didn't have a filter that could have stopped her the way Bee's should have. Again, no arguement Barr's comment was unacceptable. However, had Bee's comments (which imply incest, not just gratuitous use of "cu*t") been made by Sean Hannity and directed at Sasha Obama, the left and right would both be howling about how unacceptable they were. What makes them acceptable to you and the left is their target is Ivanka Trump. You're right... the comedy show was indeed planned ahead... supposed to be... it's comedy... (like the corespondent's dinner)... comedy is not ad lib, you know... and Hannity is not "supposed" to be a comedy show... although many of us... which included me... consider it to be somewhat of one... And if you've seen some of the pictures and things Trump has done and said with regard to his own daughter... (a fine piece of ass with Stern)... you'd understand the muse...
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Jun 3, 2018 12:56:38 GMT -5
Samantha Bee's comments were made on her comedy show... and we all know most any and everything is said on comedy shows these days... because it's entertainment and comedy... but, Roseanne's comments were not made on a comedy show... they were made by her personally off her comedy show... in a personal attack on Jarrett... big difference... And BTW... calling someone an ape... just because their skin is a little darker than yours is a serious thing... referring to someone as a feckless c*nt is figurative... and simply a non-flattering comment... after all, what the hell is a "feckless c*nt anyway?"... Sorry, no. Bee's screed was made, scripted, reviewed, and telepromptered, and wasn't comedy. The only things allowed on "comedy" shows are attacks on Trump or his family, or lies about the Pubs. Any "comedian" that says anything about The Puppet, or for Trump, is run out of town, has his family attacked, and is blacklisted from ever working in his line again. It's simply censorship in the digital age. Since the Left has no ideas that they can discuss in public, no morals, and no idea what they are doing, they have to silence anyone that disagrees with them. Not challenge their arguments, not debate them, because they would lose, and lose badly, but silence. On the other hand, anyone that they agree with has to be lauded, regardless of how obscene, disgusting, or irrational they are. As for comparing someone to an ape, how many times was Bush called "the Chimp"? What you are claiming is that it's okay coming from a brainless, no talent moron, but coming from anyone that's right of Lenin, it's a crime. And the real argument against Bee's stupidity is not the "feckless c*nt", but the fact that she was implying an incestuous relationship in the Trump family. Ask yourself what would have happened if anyone, anywhere had said the same thing about one of The Puppet's daughter? The fact that Jarrett is a terrorist supporter, and is tied to the Muslim Brotherhood opens her up to insults far more than anything Trump has done. As for "what is a feckless c*nt" anyway, see Samantha Bee. Obviously, you haven't watched much comedy... comedians have been mocking Presidents as far back as I can remember... but I'll have to admit... I'm not much on comedy... (my wife likes the late shows... I don't)... I prefer the more serious honesty... And as for "W" and "the chimp"... it wasn't presented as if he was a close ancestor of an ape... it was simply because the pictures... and I'm sure you've seen them... are eerily similar in expression... ("W" was never referred to as an ape... just looked like one)... and humorous... even "W' got a kick out of them... so did I...
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Jun 3, 2018 13:08:41 GMT -5
Neither of you guys see the distinction for one reason... and one reason alone... you don't want to see it...
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Jun 3, 2018 13:35:15 GMT -5
Neither of you guys see the distinction for one reason... and one reason alone... you don't want to see it... On the contrary. You see a distinction that doesn't exist because of your leftist bias. Bee is ok because she is like you.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Jun 3, 2018 13:40:15 GMT -5
Yes, a big difference indeed. Bee's comments were planned, thought out, scripted into her show, and deliberately broadcast by a network. That's malice aforethought by Bee, her crew, and the network. This isn't to excuse Barr, but by comparison, she just spewed her ugliness off the cuff on Twitter (possibly while stoned). She didn't have a filter that could have stopped her the way Bee's should have. Again, no arguement Barr's comment was unacceptable. However, had Bee's comments (which imply incest, not just gratuitous use of "cu*t") been made by Sean Hannity and directed at Sasha Obama, the left and right would both be howling about how unacceptable they were. What makes them acceptable to you and the left is their target is Ivanka Trump. You're right... the comedy show was indeed planned ahead... supposed to be... it's comedy... (like the corespondent's dinner)... comedy is not ad lib, you know... and Hannity is not "supposed" to be a comedy show... although many of us... which included me... consider it to be somewhat of one... It's not a comedy show. It is a hate show. Stern's show is to shock people for entertainment. Noting that was ever said on that show should be taken seriously. Lemme guess, you think Jerry Springer was real too, don't you? But neither of them crossed the line Bee crossed last week. Though Stern has come pretty close to the one Barr crossed.
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Jun 3, 2018 17:00:34 GMT -5
Neither of you guys see the distinction for one reason... and one reason alone... you don't want to see it... On the contrary. You see a distinction that doesn't exist because of your leftist bias. Bee is ok because she is like you. No, I wouldn't have said it... thought it maybe... but not said it... unlike you who probably liked it (Roseanne)... because she's like you... There is a distinct distinction... were that not true... there would be no Saturday Night Live... or any other entertainment comedy show... And you know it's true... you just won't admit it...
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Jun 3, 2018 17:08:17 GMT -5
You're right... the comedy show was indeed planned ahead... supposed to be... it's comedy... (like the corespondent's dinner)... comedy is not ad lib, you know... and Hannity is not "supposed" to be a comedy show... although many of us... which included me... consider it to be somewhat of one... It's not a comedy show. It is a hate show. Stern's show is to shock people for entertainment. Noting that was ever said on that show should be taken seriously. Lemme guess, y ou think Jerry Springer was real too, don't you?
But neither of them crossed the line Bee crossed last week. Though Stern has come pretty close to the one Barr crossed. Stern says a lot of things that can and should be taken seriously... and no, I didn't care for Springer either... I can do without that kind of "entertainment:"...
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Jun 3, 2018 18:20:16 GMT -5
On the contrary. You see a distinction that doesn't exist because of your leftist bias. Bee is ok because she is like you. No, I wouldn't have said it... thought it maybe... but not said it... unlike you who probably liked it (Roseanne)... because she's like you... There is a distinct distinction... were that not true... there would be no Saturday Night Live... or any other entertainment comedy show... And you know it's true... you just won't admit it... Again, Bee's show is a hate show, not a comedy show. How much would you be complaining if Trump responded by stating that "Bee's problem is no one is grabbing her feckless cu*t"? And no, Roseanne is a leftist. I'm not like anyone who would pick Cindy Sheehan as a Vice President. As for SNL, that hasn't existed in any meaningful form since Kevin Nealon was doing Weekend Update. It didn't exist at all during the Obama administration because they were all too cowardly to mock him in any significant way. Trump partially resurrected it, but the "we hate Trump with the white hot passion of a billion suns" schtick got stale a year ago.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Jun 3, 2018 21:53:45 GMT -5
Yes, a big difference indeed. Bee's comments were planned, thought out, scripted into her show, and deliberately broadcast by a network. That's malice aforethought by Bee, her crew, and the network. This isn't to excuse Barr, but by comparison, she just spewed her ugliness off the cuff on Twitter (possibly while stoned). She didn't have a filter that could have stopped her the way Bee's should have. Again, no arguement Barr's comment was unacceptable. However, had Bee's comments (which imply incest, not just gratuitous use of "cu*t") been made by Sean Hannity and directed at Sasha Obama, the left and right would both be howling about how unacceptable they were. What makes them acceptable to you and the left is their target is Ivanka Trump. You're right... the comedy show was indeed planned ahead... supposed to be... it's comedy... (like the corespondent's dinner)... comedy is not ad lib, you know... and Hannity is not "supposed" to be a comedy show... although many of us... which included me... consider it to be somewhat of one... And if you've seen some of the pictures and things Trump has done and said with regard to his own daughter... (a fine piece of ass with Stern)... you'd understand the muse... No, comedy, by definition, is funny. What she did was give a political speech that came directly from the commissars in Moscow, or Bejing. She is nothing but a mouth with no brain behind it, used by the Communist Left to denigrate anyone that actually has ideas for people to better themselves. Should anything ever come out about The Puppet and the way he 'relates' to his daughter, whomever brings it out will be summarily executed by the Left. They not only refuse to report on any of the crimes he has committed, but will do whatever it takes to hide anything and everything.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Jun 3, 2018 21:56:41 GMT -5
Sorry, no. Bee's screed was made, scripted, reviewed, and telepromptered, and wasn't comedy. The only things allowed on "comedy" shows are attacks on Trump or his family, or lies about the Pubs. Any "comedian" that says anything about The Puppet, or for Trump, is run out of town, has his family attacked, and is blacklisted from ever working in his line again. It's simply censorship in the digital age. Since the Left has no ideas that they can discuss in public, no morals, and no idea what they are doing, they have to silence anyone that disagrees with them. Not challenge their arguments, not debate them, because they would lose, and lose badly, but silence. On the other hand, anyone that they agree with has to be lauded, regardless of how obscene, disgusting, or irrational they are. As for comparing someone to an ape, how many times was Bush called "the Chimp"? What you are claiming is that it's okay coming from a brainless, no talent moron, but coming from anyone that's right of Lenin, it's a crime. And the real argument against Bee's stupidity is not the "feckless c*nt", but the fact that she was implying an incestuous relationship in the Trump family. Ask yourself what would have happened if anyone, anywhere had said the same thing about one of The Puppet's daughter? The fact that Jarrett is a terrorist supporter, and is tied to the Muslim Brotherhood opens her up to insults far more than anything Trump has done. As for "what is a feckless c*nt" anyway, see Samantha Bee. Obviously, you haven't watched much comedy... comedians have been mocking Presidents as far back as I can remember... but I'll have to admit... I'm not much on comedy... (my wife likes the late shows... I don't)... I prefer the more serious honesty... And as for "W" and "the chimp"... it wasn't presented as if he was a close ancestor of an ape... it was simply because the pictures... and I'm sure you've seen them... are eerily similar in expression... ("W" was never referred to as an ape... just looked like one)... and humorous... even "W' got a kick out of them... so did I... There is no 'comedy' any more. All we get is hatred of anything not Communist, not racist, not sexist, and not homophobic. The mantra of the Party of the KKK, who writes all the "material" for the alleged "comedians". You are incorrect. W was called "the Chimp" almost daily. He was compared to apes, goats, monkeys, or any other animal that could be used to degrade him. As for The Puppet, no one was allowed to make fun of him, he was the "first black President". Nothing else mattered. Not his crimes, not his treason, not his hatred of the US, nothing.
|
|