Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2013 12:54:10 GMT -5
12 Phrases Progressives Need To DitchThey are: (1). Big Business (2). Entitlements (3). Free Market Capitalism (4). Government Spending (5) Gay Marriage/Same Sex Marriage (6). Gun Control (7). Homophobic (8). Illegal Aliens (9). Pro-Life (10). Right-To-Work (11). The Environment (12). Welfare The whole point behind this is not to reform progressive ideology but rather to define it in different terms as if that would make a difference. In short, the idea is to insult the intelligence of people that don't agree with them by playing word games. Or it is satire. I'm hoping for the latter.
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Nov 11, 2013 12:57:10 GMT -5
12 Phrases Progressives Need To DitchThey are: (1). Big Business (2). Entitlements (3). Free Market Capitalism (4). Government Spending (5) Gay Marriage/Same Sex Marriage (6). Gun Control (7). Homophobic (8). Illegal Aliens (9). Pro-Life (10). Right-To-Work (11). The Environment (12). Welfare The whole point behind this is not to reform progressive ideology but rather to define it in different terms as if that would make a difference. In short, the idea is to insult the intelligence of people that don't agree with them by playing word games. Or it is satire. I'm hoping for the latter. Where do you dig up this stuff? I'll bet you 99% of Americans don't worry about such details. Just your usual political junkies
|
|
|
Post by drjohnnyfever on Nov 11, 2013 18:03:30 GMT -5
12 Phrases Progressives Need To DitchThey are: (1). Big Business (2). Entitlements (3). Free Market Capitalism (4). Government Spending (5) Gay Marriage/Same Sex Marriage (6). Gun Control (7). Homophobic (8). Illegal Aliens (9). Pro-Life (10). Right-To-Work (11). The Environment (12). Welfare The whole point behind this is not to reform progressive ideology but rather to define it in different terms as if that would make a difference. In short, the idea is to insult the intelligence of people that don't agree with them by playing word games. Or it is satire. I'm hoping for the latter. Keep hoping...after checking out the website and author it appears to be serious: >Big Business/Unelected government >Entitlements/earned benefits etc, etc When you're losing the argument-play at semantics.
|
|
|
Post by Evil Yoda on Nov 11, 2013 18:09:48 GMT -5
The food constituent "High Fructose Corn Syrup" has gotten a bad rap lately; it has been linked (albeit tenuously) with Type II diabetes. People are demanding foods without it, and makers have complied. That has caused the corn agribusiness to lose sales. Their response has been to petition the FDA for the right to call their product "corn sugar".
So, yes, sometimes people try to wash the stink off a concept or thing by renaming it. Sometimes the stink is legitimate (we remember what black people and the disabled and the mentally challenged and senior citizens were once called, right) - and sometimes it is just a matter of perspective. The article suggests phrases designed to make progressive concepts seem palatable because the writer wants them to be palatable. And, let's face it, many people are dumb enough to fall for tricks like this.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2013 18:27:58 GMT -5
12 Phrases Progressives Need To DitchThey are: (1). Big Business (2). Entitlements (3). Free Market Capitalism (4). Government Spending (5) Gay Marriage/Same Sex Marriage (6). Gun Control (7). Homophobic (8). Illegal Aliens (9). Pro-Life (10). Right-To-Work (11). The Environment (12). Welfare The whole point behind this is not to reform progressive ideology but rather to define it in different terms as if that would make a difference. In short, the idea is to insult the intelligence of people that don't agree with them by playing word games. Or it is satire. I'm hoping for the latter. Newspeak. Get with it- or Big Brother will get you. Long live Oceania!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by r686st on Nov 12, 2013 2:27:42 GMT -5
He who controls the language controls the debate.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2013 10:03:30 GMT -5
He who controls the language controls the debate. Not really. It only takes one person being honest to point out that this falls under the emperor having no clothes. A bait and switch is no way to control a debate.
|
|