|
Post by douger on Oct 28, 2013 8:47:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by niamhaine on Oct 28, 2013 11:41:50 GMT -5
Obviously the campaign trail was more important than American lives in danger. Then to attempt to cover up your staff's mistakes with side-stepping and no apologies for miscalculations and assumptions that cost innocent American lives- inexcusable. The man who was interviewed said it all. It is inconceivable to an American if your superiors were previously made aware that Al Qaeda was operating within the immediate vicinity of the American compound, that no American reinforcements were forth-coming to protect the staff. Forced to hire local rent-a-guards that the person assigned to review the safety of the compound warned his superiors several times were going to run at the first sign of trouble? As I said before- inexcusable. In the last election there were signs peppering a number of lawns stating "We got your back". Who had the backs of these US Government employees? It obviously was not the ones entrusted with their safety.
|
|
|
Post by Evil Yoda on Oct 28, 2013 15:13:05 GMT -5
I would like to know, for one, why the embassy was being used as an ammo dump. That's probably pushing the limit of what an embassy is for.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2013 15:16:31 GMT -5
I would like to know, for one, why the embassy was being used as an ammo dump. That's probably pushing the limit of what an embassy is for. Consider the location and what it might have actually have been used for. Using Libya as a funnel for arms to Syrian rebels would have been a neat operation... until you got caught. You know, if such a thing was going on.
|
|
|
Post by Evil Yoda on Oct 28, 2013 15:23:46 GMT -5
I should have been clearer. I can guess what they were doing. I want Hillary, under oath, to tell me.
Reagan and Ollie North did backchannel weapons deals and used the profits to fund the Contras. Democrats were livid. But possibly not so livid they couldn't copy the playbook.
|
|
|
Post by douger on Oct 28, 2013 15:24:46 GMT -5
I should have been clearer. I can guess what they were doing. I want Hillary, under oath, to tell me. Before or after 2016?
|
|
|
Post by Evil Yoda on Oct 28, 2013 15:26:14 GMT -5
I should have been clearer. I can guess what they were doing. I want Hillary, under oath, to tell me. Before or after 2016? Summer of 2015 works for me.
|
|
|
Post by douger on Oct 28, 2013 15:28:06 GMT -5
Alright Mav!What exactly did she do as Secretary of State? Is it an accomplishment that "with the exception of this issue of Benghazi," that there aren't any accomplishments?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2013 15:37:14 GMT -5
Why is CBS going against Obama? I am amazed this segment happened.
|
|
|
Post by douger on Oct 28, 2013 15:40:37 GMT -5
Why is CBS going against Obama? I am amazed this segment happened. What does Obama have to lose at this juncture?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2013 15:43:51 GMT -5
Ah........
|
|
|
Post by douger on Oct 28, 2013 15:44:59 GMT -5
This would be more damaging to Hillary's chances in 2016. Except that the election is still two years away. Americans can't remember that long.
|
|
|
Post by howarewegoingtopay on Oct 28, 2013 16:00:43 GMT -5
Alright Mav!What exactly did she do as Secretary of State? Is it an accomplishment that "with the exception of this issue of Benghazi," that there aren't any accomplishments? Well she racked up a lot of frequent flier miles.
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Oct 28, 2013 16:26:21 GMT -5
Ok what's the alternative?
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Oct 28, 2013 16:50:07 GMT -5
Alright Mav!What exactly did she do as Secretary of State? Is it an accomplishment that "with the exception of this issue of Benghazi," that there aren't any accomplishments? God... can't we just make McCain a Democrat?
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Oct 28, 2013 16:52:20 GMT -5
So who is the candidate? Maybe try Romney again?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2013 8:40:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Oct 29, 2013 10:15:04 GMT -5
Ok Hillary sucks and Obama is a loser. Now what? You can't only criticize. You have to offer solutions.
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Oct 29, 2013 10:18:29 GMT -5
Lol. The media hates us... Wahhhhh Personally I don't think it's the media. You guys have moaning and crying about the media forever. Instead if looking for excuses, try some introspection.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2013 10:42:33 GMT -5
Who are 'us' and 'you guys'?
For myself, I've known for quite some time not to trust progressives.
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Oct 29, 2013 10:49:16 GMT -5
Who are 'us' and 'you guys'? For myself, I've known for quite some time not to trust progressives. Never mind. No one. Dont trust any progressives. Good solid rule. Lol Cynic much?
|
|
|
Post by douger on Oct 29, 2013 10:52:12 GMT -5
Who are 'us' and 'you guys'? For myself, I've known for quite some time not to trust progressives. Never mind. No one. Dont trust any progressives. Good solid rule. Lol Cynic much? Many "progressives" don't trust conservatives either.
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Oct 29, 2013 10:58:30 GMT -5
Never mind. No one. Dont trust any progressives. Good solid rule. Lol Cynic much? Many "progressives" don't trust conservatives either. I'm way beyond that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2013 10:59:12 GMT -5
Who are 'us' and 'you guys'? For myself, I've known for quite some time not to trust progressives. Never mind. No one. Dont trust any progressives. Good solid rule. Lol Cynic much? It is called reality.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2013 11:00:32 GMT -5
Never mind. No one. Dont trust any progressives. Good solid rule. Lol Cynic much? Many "progressives" don't trust conservatives either. The GOP establishment being the poster child for that one. Hell, even the Tea Party with its social conservatism is bad news.
|
|