|
Post by Evil Yoda on Mar 23, 2015 13:12:28 GMT -5
Better go right to www.tedcruz.com and check his campaign out! Do you want to trust the presidency to a man so out of touch he forgot to grab his name for a campaign website?
|
|
|
Post by rocketwolf on Mar 23, 2015 18:23:39 GMT -5
Oh yeah that sounds like a kiss of death to me
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Mar 23, 2015 18:34:57 GMT -5
I'm sure his supporters will be able to find www.tedcruz.org and that the average Democrat voter won't be able to.
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Mar 23, 2015 20:12:54 GMT -5
Now that "Plastic" man is in... how long will it be before "Sleepy" announces?...
This is gonna be fun... again... my 11th Presidential campaign...
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Mar 23, 2015 22:19:00 GMT -5
Now that "Plastic" man is in... how long will it be before "Sleepy" announces?... This is gonna be fun... again... my 11th Presidential campaign... Well, Slimey is generating lots of press, although mostly because she has been selling access to foreign countries and ignoring US law. Again.
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Mar 23, 2015 22:27:38 GMT -5
Which one is that?... "Sleepy" and "Plastic" shouldn't be too hard to figure out... but if you need help............
|
|
|
Post by breakingbad on Mar 24, 2015 7:03:10 GMT -5
Which one is that?... "Sleepy" and "Plastic" shouldn't be too hard to figure out... but if you need help............ Really?
|
|
|
Post by Evil Yoda on Mar 24, 2015 9:00:53 GMT -5
I'm sure his supporters will be able to find www.tedcruz.org and that the average Democrat voter won't be able to. I'm sure many of them will. It's still amusing when candidates make mistakes. Supporting Ted Cruz might be that "staggeringly dumb" GOP move that puts a Dem in the whitehouse in '16. I believe Obama is worse that W was, but a lot of people don't agree. A Republican challenger won't have the groundswell of incumbent hate that Obama rode into office.
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Mar 24, 2015 9:17:46 GMT -5
Which one is that?... "Sleepy" and "Plastic" shouldn't be too hard to figure out... but if you need help............ Really? Yes... really... unless one is blind...
|
|
|
Post by breakingbad on Mar 24, 2015 9:41:34 GMT -5
Yes... really... unless one is blind... Thanks for clearing that up. I had no idea you were blind. (Really? Was in response to you not knowing who slimey was)
|
|
|
Post by Evil Yoda on Mar 24, 2015 10:03:57 GMT -5
Cruz may make the fringe happy, but he stands as much chance of winning as Warren does on the Dem side. Which is zero.
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Mar 24, 2015 10:21:18 GMT -5
Yes... really... unless one is blind... Thanks for clearing that up. I had no idea you were blind. (Really? Was in response to you not knowing who slimey was) And I was, of course, referring to "visual characterizations"... (Walker looks sleepy... Cruz looks plastic)... which is why I wondered who actually looked "slimey"... I am not familiar with a candidate or potential candidate who literally "looks" "slimey"...
|
|
|
Post by stevez51 on Mar 24, 2015 15:58:02 GMT -5
Gal pal Hil ... ??
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Mar 24, 2015 17:45:46 GMT -5
I'm sure his supporters will be able to find www.tedcruz.org and that the average Democrat voter won't be able to. I'm sure many of them will. It's still amusing when candidates make mistakes. Supporting Ted Cruz might be that "staggeringly dumb" GOP move that puts a Dem in the whitehouse in '16. I believe Obama is worse that W was, but a lot of people don't agree. A Republican challenger won't have the groundswell of incumbent hate that Obama rode into office. I don't think this is so much a mistake as it is failing to plan ahead. FWIW, if Hillary continues and survives the scandals, she probably beats Cruz. If she drops out, Cruz beats Warren and/or Biden.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Mar 24, 2015 21:11:40 GMT -5
I'm sure his supporters will be able to find www.tedcruz.org and that the average Democrat voter won't be able to. I'm sure many of them will. It's still amusing when candidates make mistakes. Supporting Ted Cruz might be that "staggeringly dumb" GOP move that puts a Dem in the whitehouse in '16. I believe Obama is worse that W was, but a lot of people don't agree. A Republican challenger won't have the groundswell of incumbent hate that Obama rode into office. Don't count on that. With Puppettax, Fast and Furious, the Middle East disaster, Russia, the border and amnesty, The Puppet may have relegated the Dems to minority status for years to come. The only ones still supporting him are those like Aboutwell, who are more than happy to live in a Communist dictatorship, as long as their checks keep coming.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Mar 24, 2015 21:13:18 GMT -5
I'm sure many of them will. It's still amusing when candidates make mistakes. Supporting Ted Cruz might be that "staggeringly dumb" GOP move that puts a Dem in the whitehouse in '16. I believe Obama is worse that W was, but a lot of people don't agree. A Republican challenger won't have the groundswell of incumbent hate that Obama rode into office. I don't think this is so much a mistake as it is failing to plan ahead. FWIW, if Hillary continues and survives the scandals, she probably beats Cruz. If she drops out, Cruz beats Warren and/or Biden. I don't think Hillary will survive the subpoenas, and subsequent indictments. Especially if she didn't obey the form that says she can't hold public office if she violates it.
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Mar 24, 2015 22:36:59 GMT -5
I don't think this is so much a mistake as it is failing to plan ahead. FWIW, if Hillary continues and survives the scandals, she probably beats Cruz. If she drops out, Cruz beats Warren and/or Biden. I don't think Hillary will survive the subpoenas, and subsequent indictments. Especially if she didn't obey the form that says she can't hold public office if she violates it. Be sure to let me know when that first indictment is issued...
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Mar 24, 2015 22:38:46 GMT -5
I'm sure many of them will. It's still amusing when candidates make mistakes. Supporting Ted Cruz might be that "staggeringly dumb" GOP move that puts a Dem in the whitehouse in '16. I believe Obama is worse that W was, but a lot of people don't agree. A Republican challenger won't have the groundswell of incumbent hate that Obama rode into office. Don't count on that. With Puppettax, Fast and Furious, the Middle East disaster, Russia, the border and amnesty, The Puppet may have relegated the Dems to minority status for years to come. The only ones still supporting him are those like Aboutwell, who are more than happy to live in a Communist dictatorship, as long as their checks keep coming. I voted against him many more time than I voted for him... I only voted for him when it was clear that he was better than his opponent... Romney...
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Mar 25, 2015 5:42:38 GMT -5
I don't think this is so much a mistake as it is failing to plan ahead. FWIW, if Hillary continues and survives the scandals, she probably beats Cruz. If she drops out, Cruz beats Warren and/or Biden. I don't think Hillary will survive the subpoenas, and subsequent indictments. Especially if she didn't obey the form that says she can't hold public office if she violates it. You're assuming Holder and/or Lynch would indict Hillary under ANY circumstances.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Mar 25, 2015 6:16:35 GMT -5
I don't think Hillary will survive the subpoenas, and subsequent indictments. Especially if she didn't obey the form that says she can't hold public office if she violates it. Be sure to let me know when that first indictment is issued... You're right. Everyone knows that Hillary could cut someone's head off ala ISIS on national TV and feast on what flowed forth; and not only would there be no indictment, the media would excuse it, and large numbers of Democrats would vote for her anyway. DOJ under holder NEVER indicts high profile Democrats. No matter how obviously corript they are.
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Mar 25, 2015 8:33:06 GMT -5
Damned straight... keep on believing it... intelligent people read your comments and just shake their heads...
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Mar 25, 2015 8:42:17 GMT -5
I don't think Hillary will survive the subpoenas, and subsequent indictments. Especially if she didn't obey the form that says she can't hold public office if she violates it. You're assuming Holder and/or Lynch would indict Hillary under ANY circumstances. If Congress finds it's balls, he may not have a choice. Besides, he's still under criminal charges of contempt, why should he even be asked? Let someone under him make the decision, someone that hasn't been as tainted with the Marxist mantra. I wonder why he's still in DOJ instead of Rykers.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Mar 25, 2015 8:43:36 GMT -5
Damned straight... keep on believing it... intelligent people read your comments and just shake their heads... Yes, at the corruption, racism, and incompetence that we have allowed to infect the entire regime, but especially the DOJ.
|
|
|
Post by Evil Yoda on Mar 25, 2015 8:47:11 GMT -5
Don't count on that. With Puppettax, Fast and Furious, the Middle East disaster, Russia, the border and amnesty, The Puppet may have relegated the Dems to minority status for years to come. The only ones still supporting him are those like Aboutwell, who are more than happy to live in a Communist dictatorship, as long as their checks keep coming. But it's mostly the far right that's consumed by that - folks like you and RJ. As opposed to the tidal wave of Bush 43 incompetence Obama sailed in on. Most of the country regarded 43 as a screw-up of the first water, and since then what support he had among the GOP has drained away to just a few, again, hard core righties. The rest want to pretend he never existed.
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Mar 25, 2015 8:49:55 GMT -5
You're assuming Holder and/or Lynch would indict Hillary under ANY circumstances. If Congress finds it's balls, he may not have a choice. Besides, he's still under criminal charges of contempt, why should he even be asked? Let someone under him make the decision, someone that hasn't been as tainted with the Marxist mantra. I wonder why he's still in DOJ instead of Rykers. He is NOT under criminal charges of contempt... SMH...
|
|