|
|
Post by Ranger John on Dec 4, 2017 17:23:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Dec 5, 2017 9:58:21 GMT -5
Looks like we finally have a court that actually read the law, and isn't declaring remarks made during the campaign to be 'legal precedent'.
|
|
|
|
Post by microg on Dec 5, 2017 10:50:13 GMT -5
While I am empathetic to those who vehemently disagree with Trump's travel ban, it was wrong for the lower courts to usurp a president's authority that has he/she clearly had.
Presidents make decisions we disagree with all the time. The way to thwart that is through legislation and through our votes.
|
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Dec 18, 2017 11:47:23 GMT -5
While I am empathetic to those who vehemently disagree with Trump's travel ban, it was wrong for the lower courts to usurp a president's authority that has he/she clearly had. Presidents make decisions we disagree with all the time. The way to thwart that is through legislation and through our votes. It's strange that the anti Americans refuse to acknowledge that Carter banned an entire group from "immigrating". |
|
