|
Post by aboutwell on Apr 4, 2018 10:12:35 GMT -5
Okay... I stand corrected... but that was because she thought she was forbidden to say anything about Trump...
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Apr 4, 2018 11:51:51 GMT -5
It really is telling how important this seems to be to Democrats/leftists.
Of all of the very real concerns facing this country and President, we're obsessing over a one night stand from 12 years ago!
Stormy Daniels isn't a story at all. The consensual one night stand puts Trump in the company of JFK and MLK Jr.
There MIGHT be a campaign finance law violation somewhere at the bottom of this, but no one in Washington can afford to make this sort of thing a serious crime, let alone an impeachable offense, or all of them would be behind bars.
The fact that this story is so prominent is good evidence that Trump is actually doing a pretty good job. It is stunning how far the efforts to get Trump have gone, and how far they've fallen.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Apr 4, 2018 19:43:34 GMT -5
Okay... I stand corrected... but that was because she thought she was forbidden to say anything about Trump... The problem with that line of thought is that she WAS saying something about Trump. If she really thought that, she should have just kept her mouth shut until her lawyer cleared her to speak about it.
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Apr 5, 2018 2:17:35 GMT -5
Yep, when she was pressed for an answer, she said no, because she thought she had to... same thing you or I would have done...
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Apr 5, 2018 7:57:21 GMT -5
Yep, when she was pressed for an answer, she said no, because she thought she had to... same thing you or I would have done... Why did she put herself out there, if she knew she was prohibited from talking about it? She voluntarily accepted the NDA, why is she now deciding to violate it?
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Apr 5, 2018 22:15:19 GMT -5
She didn't put herself out there... they found her... and since they knew something, she knew somebody had been talking about it... and it wasn't her... so she denied it...
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Apr 6, 2018 20:18:36 GMT -5
And now we have Trump's denial that he was aware of his attorney's actions. Which means that either his attorney acted without consulting his client (an ethical violation at a minimum and perhaps a campaign law violation for paying her) or the attorney was in contact with Trump and Trump is lying (which is perfectly normal for him). Maybe Mr. Trump will have to testify in this case, especially since either he or his attorney is suing Ms. Daniels for about $20 mil, a case Trump has just blown up with his denial.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Apr 7, 2018 21:12:15 GMT -5
She didn't put herself out there... they found her... and since they knew something, she knew somebody had been talking about it... and it wasn't her... so she denied it... No, they looked for anyone that they could pay, or give 15 minutes of "fame" to, to get her to make something up about Trump. She's just like the rest of the bought and paid for women that the Party of the KKK parades out for the fake news to make a big deal out of every time a Pub bothers to run for any national office. Notice that every one of them disappears instantly when the damage has been done. Where are all the women that accused Herman Cain? As soon as he dropped out of the race, and they got paid, they disappeared. Same with all of them. The only reason there are still women looking for a payday is because Trump is still President.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Apr 7, 2018 21:12:59 GMT -5
And now we have Trump's denial that he was aware of his attorney's actions. Which means that either his attorney acted without consulting his client (an ethical violation at a minimum and perhaps a campaign law violation for paying her) or the attorney was in contact with Trump and Trump is lying (which is perfectly normal for him). Maybe Mr. Trump will have to testify in this case, especially since either he or his attorney is suing Ms. Daniels for about $20 mil, a case Trump has just blown up with his denial. Or, his attorneys will find out, in discovery, how much the Party of the KKK paid her to make her accusations.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Apr 16, 2018 7:45:00 GMT -5
And now we have Trump's denial that he was aware of his attorney's actions. Which means that either his attorney acted without consulting his client (an ethical violation at a minimum and perhaps a campaign law violation for paying her) or the attorney was in contact with Trump and Trump is lying (which is perfectly normal for him). Maybe Mr. Trump will have to testify in this case, especially since either he or his attorney is suing Ms. Daniels for about $20 mil, a case Trump has just blown up with his denial. Or, his attorneys will find out, in discovery, how much the Party of the KKK paid her to make her accusations. In her interview the other day, Daniels claimed that a) she didn't want to have sex with Trump, and also b) that she wasn't raped and isn't a victim. So that raises the question, why did she do it? What was she hoping to gain from this? Maybe she was hoping Trump would help her with her career. Maybe she was angling for a payout. It's pretty clear that she's willing to say and do just about anything for money and/or to get ahead.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Apr 16, 2018 10:38:39 GMT -5
Or, his attorneys will find out, in discovery, how much the Party of the KKK paid her to make her accusations. In her interview the other day, Daniels claimed that a) she didn't want to have sex with Trump, and also b) that she wasn't raped and isn't a victim. So that raises the question, why did she do it? What was she hoping to gain from this? Maybe she was hoping Trump would help her with her career. Maybe she was angling for a payout. It's pretty clear that she's willing to say and do just about anything for money and/or to get ahead. I have a feeling that she's just another down and out female that the Party of the KKK dug up, paid, then will abandon as soon as she has done what they want her to do. She will disappear just like all the other paid mouthpieces that accuse Pubs every time they run for office, and the Party of the KKK can't argue the facts.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Apr 16, 2018 11:35:01 GMT -5
In her interview the other day, Daniels claimed that a) she didn't want to have sex with Trump, and also b) that she wasn't raped and isn't a victim. So that raises the question, why did she do it? What was she hoping to gain from this? Maybe she was hoping Trump would help her with her career. Maybe she was angling for a payout. It's pretty clear that she's willing to say and do just about anything for money and/or to get ahead. I have a feeling that she's just another down and out female that the Party of the KKK dug up, paid, then will abandon as soon as she has done what they want her to do. She will disappear just like all the other paid mouthpieces that accuse Pubs every time they run for office, and the Party of the KKK can't argue the facts. Oh she'll definitely be gone when the Democrats (including the media) discover she is no longer useful. She'll go right back to being the nobody she was.
|
|