|
|
Post by palealeman on Feb 17, 2018 11:20:52 GMT -5
Now reports surface that President Trump had another affair, and that a friend of his "bought" the story so that it couldn't be published. That's at least 2 women who have been bought off.
2 questions come to mind:
(1) How long before Melania files for divorce? She doesn't need the constant humiliation that comes from being married to this scumbag.
(2) It appears that Stormy Davis was paid off to keep her silent during the election. Does this constitute some sort of election violation? I seem to remember John Edwards getting charged for the same sort of thing.
Of course, the "usual suspects" will point out that the President denies these allegations, and therefore he must be given the benefit of the doubt and, because he denies anything, probably didn't do anything. On the other hand, where there's smoke -- and a lot of smoke -- there's probably some fire.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Feb 17, 2018 11:44:32 GMT -5
Now reports surface that President Trump had another affair, and that a friend of his "bought" the story so that it couldn't be published. That's at least 2 women who have been bought off. 2 questions come to mind: (1) How long before Melania files for divorce? She doesn't need the constant humiliation that comes from being married to this scumbag. (2) It appears that Stormy Davis was paid off to keep her silent during the election. Does this constitute some sort of election violation? I seem to remember John Edwards getting charged for the same sort of thing. Of course, the "usual suspects" will point out that the President denies these allegations, and therefore he must be given the benefit of the doubt and, because he denies anything, probably didn't do anything. On the other hand, where there's smoke -- and a lot of smoke -- there's probably some fire. 1) Neither you nor I know what sort of understanding Donald and Melania have. For all you know, she could be inviting women in for three-ways. Either way, how is it that this sort of behavior is problematic for Hillary supporters? Even now, this still hasn't reached rape accusations or sex with interns in the oval office level of scum-baggery the Clintons gave us. 2) I believe Edwards got in trouble for paying women off with campaign funds. That hasn't been alleged yet. |
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Feb 17, 2018 21:02:51 GMT -5
Now reports surface that President Trump had another affair, and that a friend of his "bought" the story so that it couldn't be published. That's at least 2 women who have been bought off. 2 questions come to mind: (1) How long before Melania files for divorce? She doesn't need the constant humiliation that comes from being married to this scumbag. (2) It appears that Stormy Davis was paid off to keep her silent during the election. Does this constitute some sort of election violation? I seem to remember John Edwards getting charged for the same sort of thing. Of course, the "usual suspects" will point out that the President denies these allegations, and therefore he must be given the benefit of the doubt and, because he denies anything, probably didn't do anything. On the other hand, where there's smoke -- and a lot of smoke -- there's probably some fire. He's a Pub. The accusations are coming from likely Dems, or women that the Party of the KKK paid to make accusations. Therefore, until there is some proof, other than the accuser, it can be dismissed out of hand. |
|
|
|
Post by freddfish on Mar 28, 2018 16:04:25 GMT -5
It must really suck to be a Democrat, in the wake of Slick Willy. Try to sling a little mud, and the rest of the country reminds you immediatlely about how you all went all-in for Bill and ll his pervy sexual harassing, rapes, adulteries, etc.
Kinda like having a real nice gun that just won't shoot.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Mar 28, 2018 17:10:29 GMT -5
It must really suck to be a Democrat, in the wake of Slick Willy. Try to sling a little mud, and the rest of the country reminds you immediatlely about how you all went all-in for Bill and ll his pervy sexual harassing, rapes, adulteries, etc. Kinda like having a real nice gun that just won't shoot. It would work a lot better if the Democrats had run almost anyone other than Bill's enabler in chief. |
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Mar 29, 2018 9:46:19 GMT -5
It must really suck to be a Democrat, in the wake of Slick Willy. Try to sling a little mud, and the rest of the country reminds you immediatlely about how you all went all-in for Bill and ll his pervy sexual harassing, rapes, adulteries, etc. Kinda like having a real nice gun that just won't shoot. It would work a lot better if the Democrats had run almost anyone other than Bill's enabler in chief. Not really. Their entire organization has become the Communist Party USA. Their entire "leadership" is implicated in sedition, possibly even insurrection, and they have no one that anybody that can think, and hasn't been indoctrinated in the concentration camps of public schooling, would vote for. |
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Mar 29, 2018 9:55:19 GMT -5
It would work a lot better if the Democrats had run almost anyone other than Bill's enabler in chief. Not really. Their entire organization has become the Communist Party USA. Their entire "leadership" is implicated in sedition, possibly even insurrection, and they have no one that anybody that can think, and hasn't been indoctrinated in the concentration camps of public schooling, would vote for. Here's the problem with that idea: much of the country is too unaware to care because the media is in on the scam. However, if your goal is to differentiate yourself from Trump's womanizing, you are definitely better off with a candidate who didn't enable Bill Clinton's womanizing. Much the same way that if it is your goal to separate your party from Obamacare, you are definitely better off with someone other than the guy who created Romneycare. |
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Mar 29, 2018 10:34:23 GMT -5
Not really. Their entire organization has become the Communist Party USA. Their entire "leadership" is implicated in sedition, possibly even insurrection, and they have no one that anybody that can think, and hasn't been indoctrinated in the concentration camps of public schooling, would vote for. Here's the problem with that idea: much of the country is too unaware to care because the media is in on the scam. However, if your goal is to differentiate yourself from Trump's womanizing, you are definitely better off with a candidate who didn't enable Bill Clinton's womanizing. Much the same way that if it is your goal to separate your party from Obamacare, you are definitely better off with someone other than the guy who created Romneycare. I agree with that, however, the LR media is on the decline, which is why they have screamed so far Left. Since real people are starting to catch on to their lies, innuendo, half truths, and lies by omission, the only audience they have left are the hard core Leftists. Especially when their lies are so easily exposed. The Pubs aren't in that much better position, but they have Cruz, Rubio, Love, and a few that might appeal to folks that are simply disgusted with the status quo. Or, there may be another Trump out there for them, one with less baggage. |
|
|
|
Post by 3000fps on Mar 30, 2018 23:41:21 GMT -5
Imagine that, once upon a time the lower than pond scum once said sex between consenting adults didn't matter, no matter where, when or marital status. They also said military service no longer mattered even if one loathed the military. Fast forward past 2 presidents where one seemed normal in hi9s relationship and the other seemingly loves his transsexual. One flew century series supersonic jets, the other would never be considered for military service with his admitted drug abuse. Present time, another adulterer that had sex on his time and as a private citizen. He too dodged the draft but never ran to a foreign country and protest there as well. NOW all of a sudden marital fidelity and military service matter.... WT-F is going on?  |
|
|
|
Post by breakingbad on Mar 31, 2018 6:08:41 GMT -5
Aw, the poor OP didn't get what he wanted from the "usual suspects". I'll bet he was a John Edwards supported at the time too.
|
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Mar 31, 2018 20:28:51 GMT -5
Wasn't it the same people pushing for impeaching Trump over alleged affairs that screamed and went into hysterics claiming that sex between 2 consenting adults, any time, any where, even in the Oval Office, was private, and no one's business? And that lies about sex were normal, and no big deal?
|
|
|
|
Post by breakingbad on Mar 31, 2018 20:57:41 GMT -5
Wasn't it the same people pushing for impeaching Trump over alleged affairs that screamed and went into hysterics claiming that sex between 2 consenting adults, any time, any where, even in the Oval Office, was private, and no one's business? And that lies about sex were normal, and no big deal? Funny thing, tribalism. Sort of like the same people that were screaming for Slick Willie's impeachment are now dismissing the goofy things that Trump does. |
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Mar 31, 2018 21:20:54 GMT -5
Wasn't it the same people pushing for impeaching Trump over alleged affairs that screamed and went into hysterics claiming that sex between 2 consenting adults, any time, any where, even in the Oval Office, was private, and no one's business? And that lies about sex were normal, and no big deal? Funny thing, tribalism. Sort of like the same people that were screaming for Slick Willie's impeachment are now dismissing the goofy things that Trump does. This is 1) true as far as it goes, but also 2) a wholly ridiculous comparison. Slick Willie’s extra-marital activities took place inside the White House with interns. Clinton was credibly accused of rape. Furthermore, Clinton was impeached over purnury, not over sex. By comparison, Stormy Daniels was a one night stand from 12 years ago. While Trump’s behavior was immoral, he is a veritable choirboy compared to Clinton. Or Kennedy... or even Martin Luther King Jr. |
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Mar 31, 2018 22:27:15 GMT -5
Ranger John... can you give me the name of that "second intern" Clinton had an extra-marital affair with in the White House?... and what gives credibility to Broadrick's allegation?... (nothing)... and Clinton was impeached for obstruction of justice and perjury... and was acquitted on both charges... and when does a several months period of having sexual relations with someone amount to a "one night stand?"... Inquiring minds want to know... asking for a friend...  |
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Apr 1, 2018 13:17:22 GMT -5
Wasn't it the same people pushing for impeaching Trump over alleged affairs that screamed and went into hysterics claiming that sex between 2 consenting adults, any time, any where, even in the Oval Office, was private, and no one's business? And that lies about sex were normal, and no big deal? Funny thing, tribalism. Sort of like the same people that were screaming for Slick Willie's impeachment are now dismissing the goofy things that Trump does. Most weren't calling for his impeachment for the 'indiscretions', but for his lying about them. And for a few other 'pecadillos', like not only firing the travel office, but then prosecuting them for non crimes, the whole list of security clearance forms sent to his wife, things like that. |
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Apr 1, 2018 13:20:26 GMT -5
Ranger John... can you give me the name of that "second intern" Clinton had an extra-marital affair with in the White House?... and what gives credibility to Broadrick's allegation?... (nothing)... and Clinton was impeached for obstruction of justice and perjury... and was acquitted on both charges... and when does a several months period of having sexual relations with someone amount to a "one night stand?"... Inquiring minds want to know... asking for a friend... He was "acquitted" because not a single Democrat was willing to even look at the evidence. I think it was Little Chucky Schumer that said something like "it doesn't really matter what the evidence is, he's not going to be convicted". The same Democrat Party that laughed off the theft of classified information from the Library of Congress by Sandy Burglar, who then simply threw it awayt in a construction site. |
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Apr 1, 2018 13:21:17 GMT -5
Ranger John... can you give me the name of that "second intern" Clinton had an extra-marital affair with in the White House?... and what gives credibility to Broadrick's allegation?... (nothing)... and Clinton was impeached for obstruction of justice and perjury... and was acquitted on both charges... and when does a several months period of having sexual relations with someone amount to a "one night stand?"... Inquiring minds want to know... asking for a friend... This is the same woman that swore less than 3 months ago that she never had an affair with Trump. So, was she lying then, or is she lying now? |
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Apr 1, 2018 16:19:10 GMT -5
A jury's prerogative... and while we may not like it, we have to accept it... as in O.J...
And three months ago, this woman was afraid to say anything for fear of Trump's retaliation... she had been threatened you know...
|
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Apr 1, 2018 18:36:59 GMT -5
A jury's prerogative... and while we may not like it, we have to accept it... as in O.J... And three months ago, this woman was afraid to say anything for fear of Trump's retaliation... she had been threatened you know... Nope. All we have is her word, and that's been proven pretty worthless. She swore that she didn't have an affair, and now says she does. I think the Party of the KKK started dangling money, or something else in front of her. Just like they have so many others. |
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Apr 1, 2018 22:52:03 GMT -5
She didn't swear to anything. Redleg... and she hasn't been caught in even one single white lie... Trump has... in the thousands...
|
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Apr 2, 2018 9:23:57 GMT -5
She didn't swear to anything. Redleg... and she hasn't been caught in even one single white lie... Trump has... in the thousands... Ah, so swearing up and down that she never had an affair with Trump one day, and now, when the money is showing it's self, swearing up and down that she did is not a lie? Claiming that she was 'intimidated', but doesn't know who was doing the threatening, but claiming she has the evidence, but refusing to show any of it, none of those qualify as lies in your world? |
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Apr 2, 2018 10:56:48 GMT -5
As in an "official swearing," Redleg... not just saying it... (the $$$ not to tell showed up just before the 2016 election)... and last I heard, the man who is supposed to have threatened her didn't introduce himself... and I'll wait to see if she really has anything before I'll refer to her as a liar...
|
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Apr 3, 2018 8:36:48 GMT -5
As in an "official swearing," Redleg... not just saying it... (the $$$ not to tell showed up just before the 2016 election)... and last I heard, the man who is supposed to have threatened her didn't introduce himself... and I'll wait to see if she really has anything before I'll refer to her as a liar... Ah, yes. If she wasn't being deposed, and wasn't under oath, then it wasn't a lie, because no judge heard her. Just like Waco Bill Boy and his definition of "is". She lied, and you refuse to admit it. She either lied when she said she didn't have an affair, or she's lying now. There is no 'gray' area. There was no threat, unless you and she are talking about the consequences of her violating the non disclosure. She's lying about that as well, to get sympathy and air time on the LR media. |
|
|
|
Post by aboutwell on Apr 3, 2018 14:00:18 GMT -5
Sure she lied... I didn't say she didn't... but she didn't swear to it... and she had been paid to keep quiet about it... and her safety was threatened when she didn't... and neither you nor I know any different than that... it's just out opinion... but knowing Trump... who has been sued over 3,500 times... my $$$'s on her...
|
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Apr 4, 2018 8:59:22 GMT -5
Sure she lied... I didn't say she didn't... but she didn't swear to it... and she had been paid to keep quiet about it... and her safety was threatened when she didn't... and neither you nor I know any different than that... it's just out opinion... but knowing Trump... who has been sued over 3,500 times... my $$$'s on her... 4 posts above, you said "she hasn't been caught in a single white lie". She lied. I think she's lying about being threatened. She said that to gain sympathy and to 'explain' her lies before her current lies. |
|
