|
Post by microg on Jul 11, 2018 8:24:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Jul 11, 2018 9:07:27 GMT -5
It is pretty clear that it doesn't matter who the candidate is, or what he or she believes. The only thing that matters is that they resist Trump on anything and everything. If Trump cures cancer, the Democrats will resist.
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Jul 11, 2018 10:18:46 GMT -5
As the Republicans spent 8 years resisting everything President Obama proposed. Why are you surprised that our "government' has become so partisan? Our commie friend still denigrates President Obama today, even though he's no longer in office. As the Republicans are showing, it's all about power and money.
|
|
|
Post by 3000fps on Jul 11, 2018 10:31:18 GMT -5
As the Republicans spent 8 years resisting everything President Obama proposed. Why are you surprised that our "government' has become so partisan? Our commie friend still denigrates President Obama today, even though he's no longer in office. As the Republicans are showing, it's all about power and money. obama got BOTH Kagan and Sotomayor in with little resistance. I mean, didn't McCain claim he should get to choose who he likes and obama with his "I won"?
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Jul 11, 2018 10:42:26 GMT -5
As the Republicans spent 8 years resisting everything President Obama proposed. Why are you surprised that our "government' has become so partisan? Our commie friend still denigrates President Obama today, even though he's no longer in office. As the Republicans are showing, it's all about power and money. That's not even remotely true. They opposed Obamacare, and the Iran deal. Both of which Obama got, and both of which have been awful. He also got his sequester, and most of his educational agenda. Obama got his SCOTUS picks without much difficulty, until he tried to violate the Biden Rule. No one in his administration was refused service at a restaurant like Sarah Sanders, or was harassed in one like Pruitt and Nielsen.
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Jul 11, 2018 19:50:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Jul 12, 2018 4:45:05 GMT -5
The first article just states the GOP treated Obama like an extreme threat to the country. I'm not going to bother with republicanssuck.org for obvious reasons. Or the 5 ways The GOP obstructed Obama. The simple truth is, a large chunk of the country realized Obama was an extremist when the Democrats implemented Obamacare. This is why the GOP has gained control of so many political offices over the last 10 years. And it is a lesson the Democrats haven't figured out yet. Which is why they're doubling down on their extremism, and the "blue wave" you probably still think is going to happen in a few months is increasingly looking like a pipe dream.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Jul 12, 2018 9:04:15 GMT -5
As the Republicans spent 8 years resisting everything President Obama proposed. Why are you surprised that our "government' has become so partisan? Our commie friend still denigrates President Obama today, even though he's no longer in office. As the Republicans are showing, it's all about power and money. Really? Then how did he get Puppettax through? How about his complete abeyance of immigration law? His use of the FBI, IRS, EPA, ATF, et al, to undermine our Constitutional government? The Pubs caved on nearly everything he wanted, from budgets, to 'sequester' to his choice of 2 SCOTUS judges. The Party of the KKK is simply whining like 3 year olds, because they can't get a judge that will create law from the bench, to further the Communist agenda the Party of the KKK wants.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Jul 12, 2018 9:07:56 GMT -5
So, now you are denying reality? Again? Yes, Sarah Sanders was driven from a resteraunt because she works for the Trump Administration, so was Nielsen. As for your articles, of course they are claiming The Puppet was "obstructed", because some of the Pubs actually stood up against his Communist agenda. However, he got nearly everything he wanted, and in many cases, far more than he demanded. Like in the CR's passed, that gave him far more money for his agenda than he demanded.
|
|
|
Post by microg on Jul 12, 2018 9:15:23 GMT -5
republicanssucks.org? It's almost as if some activists are in such denial that they don't feel the need to hide their bias anymore. Some degree of obstruction is normal and healthy in government; it's a check between going too far to the right or to the left. With that said, I'm tired of each side upping the ante whenever power changes hands. We really need to abolish political parties so that people can hold a more diverse portfolio of views. For example: Someone who is pro-gun, pro-union, anti-illegal, pro-choice, and pro-minimum wage presently makes heads explode in either party and that is a problem. This is exactly why I chose to leave the democratic party; I got tired of my views being decided for me. The lack of an artificial political party boundary would hopefully encourage more cooperation between colleagues and less of trying to win one for the R or D team.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Jul 12, 2018 9:18:45 GMT -5
republicanssucks.org? It's almost as if some activists are in such denial that they don't feel the need to hide their bias anymore. Some degree of obstruction is normal and healthy in government; it's a check between going too far to the right or to the left. With that said, I'm tired of each side upping the ante whenever power changes hands. We really need to abolish political parties so that people can hold a more diverse portfolio of views. For example: Someone who is pro-gun, pro-union, anti-illegal, pro-choice, and pro-minimum wage presently makes heads explode in either party and that is a problem. This is exactly why I chose to leave the democratic party; I got tired of my views being decided for me. The lack of an artificial political party boundary would hopefully encourage more cooperation between colleagues and less of trying to win one for the R or D team. While I agree with you to a point, the problem is, how do we do that? Parties provide the framework for those that want to run for Federal office. Without that framework, we would have hundreds, if not thousands, of people running for every position, every election. Only those that can raise enough money to get their heads above the noise would even have a chance of being elected. We would have an even worse case of our government being owned by those rich enough to buy a candidate's way into office.
|
|
|
Post by 3000fps on Jul 12, 2018 11:14:43 GMT -5
republicanssuck.org??? So much for credibility, thanks for the chuckle.
|
|
|
Post by palealeman on Jul 13, 2018 16:40:33 GMT -5
You guys all complain about a web site. Did anyone actually bother to read any of the articles?
Maybe, before shooting the messenger, you should look at the message.
Fact: Republicans spent 8 years opposing anything President Obama proposed. Yes, some stuff got through Congress. But the opposition continued for 8 years.
Fact: Democrats have spent about 18 months opposing much of what our failing president has proposed. Some things have gotten through Congress (like the tax bill that favors the rich and does nothing for the middle class). But, according to the regressives, opposing the failing president shouldn't be happening.
If it's good for the goose, it's good for the gander. Sorry you guys can't look at anything objectively.
|
|
|
Post by 3000fps on Jul 13, 2018 17:50:44 GMT -5
You guys all complain about a web site. Did anyone actually bother to read any of the articles? Maybe, before shooting the messenger, you should look at the message. Fact: Republicans spent 8 years opposing anything President Obama proposed. Yes, some stuff got through Congress. But the opposition continued for 8 years. Fact: Democrats have spent about 18 months opposing much of what our failing president has proposed. Some things have gotten through Congress (like the tax bill that favors the rich and does nothing for the middle class). But, according to the regressives, opposing the failing president shouldn't be happening. If it's good for the goose, it's good for the gander. Sorry you guys can't look at anything objectively. I'll take your $24,000 tax crumb if you don't want it. Not sure about you but I'm tickled he pulled out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, ridicules Paris Climate Agreement and hideous Iranian "deal". Proof positive obama was still hitting the bong. Trump was my 17th choice, WOULD have been 18th if the nuts on the left would have given Webb the courtesy of a look.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Jul 13, 2018 21:55:03 GMT -5
You guys all complain about a web site. Did anyone actually bother to read any of the articles? Maybe, before shooting the messenger, you should look at the message. Fact: Republicans spent 8 years opposing anything President Obama proposed. Yes, some stuff got through Congress. But the opposition continued for 8 years. Fact: Democrats have spent about 18 months opposing much of what our failing president has proposed. Some things have gotten through Congress (like the tax bill that favors the rich and does nothing for the middle class). But, according to the regressives, opposing the failing president shouldn't be happening. If it's good for the goose, it's good for the gander. Sorry you guys can't look at anything objectively. Not exactly. THe Puppet got 2 judges seated on SCOTUS. He got the sequester, which is still damaging the military. He got Puppettax forced through, despite a majority of Americans being against it. The only good thing he did was turn a majority of governorships, and over 1000 state legislators Republican. The Party of the KKK isn't "opposing" Trump, they are instituting a coup. The "Russian collusion" gameshow was cooked up by Felonia von Pantsuit, and Mueller has put together the most crooked, unethical, and criminal group of Communists he could buy to "investigate" it. Weismann has had nearly every one of his convictions overturned, been censored by more than one court, and should have been prosecuted for his actions with Enron. But Mueller put him in charge. Got it.
|
|
|
Post by demopublican on Jul 13, 2018 21:59:04 GMT -5
I can’t wait until we find out what this guy really bought when he racked up all that credit card debt and how he paid it off
|
|
|
Post by 3000fps on Jul 13, 2018 23:24:37 GMT -5
I can’t wait until we find out what this guy really bought when he racked up all that credit card debt and how he paid it off Beings he's obviously a baseball fan he bought BB cards in massive quantity.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Jul 14, 2018 7:23:31 GMT -5
I can’t wait until we find out what this guy really bought when he racked up all that credit card debt and how he paid it off Yeah. Can't wait to read the guy's credit card statements. LMAO.
|
|
|
Post by howarewegoingtopay on Jul 14, 2018 12:08:42 GMT -5
republicanssucks.org? It's almost as if some activists are in such denial that they don't feel the need to hide their bias anymore. Some degree of obstruction is normal and healthy in government; it's a check between going too far to the right or to the left. With that said, I'm tired of each side upping the ante whenever power changes hands. We really need to abolish political parties so that people can hold a more diverse portfolio of views. For example: Someone who is pro-gun, pro-union, anti-illegal, pro-choice, and pro-minimum wage presently makes heads explode in either party and that is a problem. This is exactly why I chose to leave the democratic party; I got tired of my views being decided for me. The lack of an artificial political party boundary would hopefully encourage more cooperation between colleagues and less of trying to win one for the R or D team. While I agree with you to a point, the problem is, how do we do that? Parties provide the framework for those that want to run for Federal office. Without that framework, we would have hundreds, if not thousands, of people running for every position, every election. Only those that can raise enough money to get their heads above the noise would even have a chance of being elected. We would have an even worse case of our government being owned by those rich enough to buy a candidate's way into office. Government selected by plurality. Hmmmm sounds familiar.
|
|
|
Post by demopublican on Jul 14, 2018 12:55:42 GMT -5
While I agree with you to a point, the problem is, how do we do that? Parties provide the framework for those that want to run for Federal office. Without that framework, we would have hundreds, if not thousands, of people running for every position, every election. Only those that can raise enough money to get their heads above the noise would even have a chance of being elected. We would have an even worse case of our government being owned by those rich enough to buy a candidate's way into office. Government selected by plurality. Hmmmm sounds familiar. What’s he have to hide?
|
|
|
Post by microg on Jul 14, 2018 17:29:30 GMT -5
You guys all complain about a web site. Did anyone actually bother to read any of the articles? Maybe, before shooting the messenger, you should look at the message. Fact: Republicans spent 8 years opposing anything President Obama proposed. Yes, some stuff got through Congress. But the opposition continued for 8 years. Fact: Democrats have spent about 18 months opposing much of what our failing president has proposed. Some things have gotten through Congress (like the tax bill that favors the rich and does nothing for the middle class). But, according to the regressives, opposing the failing president shouldn't be happening. If it's good for the goose, it's good for the gander. Sorry you guys can't look at anything objectively. I'll take your $24,000 tax crumb if you don't want it. Not sure about you but I'm tickled he pulled out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, ridicules Paris Climate Agreement and hideous Iranian "deal". Proof positive obama was still hitting the bong. Trump was my 17th choice, WOULD have been 18th if the nuts on the left would have given Webb the courtesy of a look. Jim Webb was my first place pick on the democrat side. 3rd overall.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Jul 14, 2018 17:36:29 GMT -5
Government selected by plurality. Hmmmm sounds familiar. What’s he have to hide? Apparently nothing if we're obsessing over Nationals tickets.
|
|
|
Post by demopublican on Jul 14, 2018 19:27:18 GMT -5
Apparently nothing if we're obsessing over Nationals tickets. So he should release the records
|
|
|
Post by 3000fps on Jul 14, 2018 23:15:27 GMT -5
I'll take your $24,000 tax crumb if you don't want it. Not sure about you but I'm tickled he pulled out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, ridicules Paris Climate Agreement and hideous Iranian "deal". Proof positive obama was still hitting the bong. Trump was my 17th choice, WOULD have been 18th if the nuts on the left would have given Webb the courtesy of a look. Jim Webb was my first place pick on the democrat side. 3rd overall. I liked him overall but he even lost to O'Mouthy. If he isn't "free everything" snowballs chance in hell.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Jul 15, 2018 10:30:53 GMT -5
Apparently nothing if we're obsessing over Nationals tickets. So he should release the records Why? Because you think he went to too many baseball games?
|
|