|
Post by howarewegoingtopay on Aug 20, 2014 18:34:32 GMT -5
Yes, links to other opinions is one of the reasons that I read this forum. When he has repeatedly stated that the eye fracture is a proven lie, then it is no longer being expressed as his opinion, but fact. So I wish to read what he considers fact , and proven. Somehow I do doubt that it is proven fact because we are not getting facts from this situation yet, just opinions. Anyone with half a brain could see it was a lie……oh wait…….. More insults. Do you have some factual source that proves it a lie? All we have on the side that it is true is someone saying a source inside the investigation said so, do you have something more? If so then put up or shut up.
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Aug 20, 2014 18:35:59 GMT -5
Anyone with half a brain could see it was a lie……oh wait…….. More insults. Do you have some factual source that proves it a lie? All we have on the side that it is true is someone saying a source inside the investigation said so, do you have something more? If so then put up or shut up. So by you bringing up insults, are you saying that you don't insult, and out the other right wing posters here don't insult? Is it part of the toa that only right-winger posters can insult? Is that what you're defending?
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Aug 20, 2014 18:36:52 GMT -5
More insults. Do you have some factual source that proves it a lie? All we have on the side that it is true is someone saying a source inside the investigation said so, do you have something more? If so then put up or shut up. So by you bringing up insults, are you saying that you don't insult, and out the other right wing posters here don't insult? Is it part of the toa that only right-winger posters can insult? Is that what you're defending? I would have to say "put up or shut up" is an insulting phrase to say to someone
|
|
|
Post by lombardi6 on Aug 20, 2014 18:37:27 GMT -5
I just love to watch the wacko left flail away to justify their feelings(not rational thoughts). They have so much emotion invested in their predetermined outcome ,a loss would be too much to bear. The desperation is delicious.
|
|
|
Post by howarewegoingtopay on Aug 20, 2014 18:38:15 GMT -5
More insults. Do you have some factual source that proves it a lie? All we have on the side that it is true is someone saying a source inside the investigation said so, do you have something more? If so then put up or shut up. So by you bringing up insults, are you saying that you don't insult, and out the other right wing posters here don't insult? Is it part of the toa that only right-winger posters can insult? Is that what you're defending? Your post is a bit disjointed, care to explain? Righties get punished as well as lefties for insulting others.
|
|
|
Post by howarewegoingtopay on Aug 20, 2014 18:39:39 GMT -5
So by you bringing up insults, are you saying that you don't insult, and out the other right wing posters here don't insult? Is it part of the toa that only right-winger posters can insult? Is that what you're defending? I would have to say "put up or shut up" is an insulting phrase to say to someone Well what you say in your post would show that you are wrong. It is well known that when someone states a fact that they need to supply the source of their knowledge, I am just asking for that knowledge and requesting that if they do not have it that they cease to post lies.
|
|
|
Post by kashmir on Aug 20, 2014 18:42:51 GMT -5
Anyone with half a brain could see it was a lie……oh wait…….. So the DA and St Louis police department are lying about the eye fracture? Well if so, I'm sure Eric Holder will be ALL over it Okay, quote them. Name and quote.
|
|
|
Post by winston on Aug 20, 2014 18:51:44 GMT -5
You got a lot of nerve, learn to take your own advice. Start with yourself first, You hear and say a lot of things that are untrue when it fits your agenda. I have no agenda, you on the the other hand have a serious anger agenda ..... Your opinion is not a fact
|
|
|
Post by winston on Aug 20, 2014 18:55:20 GMT -5
I just love to watch the wacko left flail away to justify their feelings(not rational thoughts). They have so much emotion invested in their predetermined outcome ,a loss would be too much to bear. The desperation is delicious. Whoever said you have or had a rational thought or an original thought?
|
|
|
Post by winston on Aug 20, 2014 19:02:02 GMT -5
Stop whining.
Well, prove the story wrong. Put up or shut up
My response was to the author's story. Read some of his other articles. He even uses some old 60's lines. If people will not give this tragedy a chance to be solved we will not know. Take your own advice and have a nice day. Peace
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2014 19:04:05 GMT -5
The looters do not care a whit about Michael Brown.
|
|
|
Post by winston on Aug 20, 2014 19:04:54 GMT -5
So the DA and St Louis police department are lying about the eye fracture? Well if so, I'm sure Eric Holder will be ALL over it Okay, quote them. Name and quote. Don't expect a true reply
|
|
|
Post by winston on Aug 20, 2014 19:05:46 GMT -5
The looters do not care a whit about Michael Brown. We agree on something.
|
|
|
Post by winston on Aug 20, 2014 19:11:43 GMT -5
You got a lot of nerve, learn to take your own advice. Start with yourself first, You hear and say a lot of things that are untrue when it fits your agenda. No I don't. You don't take, your own advice. LOLROTF
|
|
|
Post by howarewegoingtopay on Aug 20, 2014 19:39:56 GMT -5
Okay, quote them. Name and quote. Don't expect a true reply I notice that you are not answering my question either. My link just stated the source was from the investigation, not who leaked it. So as we all know sources in these kinds of incidents are very unreliable how about you showing us your source for the "fact" that it was "proven" a lie?
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Aug 20, 2014 20:37:07 GMT -5
The fractured eye socket is a proven lie? Link? How is it proven to be a lie? linkMost of the major news outlets are now reporting on the officer having a 'serious facial injury.' They're not naming sources yet, but it seems to me sooner or later, someone's going to come up with a photo and we'll know. Of course anyone who asserts that such a story is a lie is only fooling themselves.
|
|
|
Post by winston on Aug 20, 2014 21:24:31 GMT -5
How is it proven to be a lie? linkMost of the major news outlets are now reporting on the officer having a 'serious facial injury.' They're not naming sources yet, but it seems to me sooner or later, someone's going to come up with a photo and we'll know. Of course anyone who asserts that such a story is a lie is only fooling themselves. Help me out with proof. Without proof, you made a foolish statement.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Aug 20, 2014 21:30:46 GMT -5
Most of the major news outlets are now reporting on the officer having a 'serious facial injury.' They're not naming sources yet, but it seems to me sooner or later, someone's going to come up with a photo and we'll know. Of course anyone who asserts that such a story is a lie is only fooling themselves. Help me out with proof. As of this moment, there is no proof either way. What there appears to be are multiple, as yet anonymous sources, telling this information to the media. I am sure, at some point, there will be proof. Until then, asserting that it's a lie is, itself, a lie.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2014 21:36:10 GMT -5
As of this moment, there is no proof either way. What there appears to be are multiple, as yet anonymous sources, telling this information to the media. I am sure, at some point, there will be proof. Until then, asserting that it's a lie is, itself, a lie. This case is not cut and dried. Sharpton is useless.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger John on Aug 20, 2014 21:46:42 GMT -5
As of this moment, there is no proof either way. What there appears to be are multiple, as yet anonymous sources, telling this information to the media. I am sure, at some point, there will be proof. Until then, asserting that it's a lie is, itself, a lie. This case is not cut and dried. Sharpton is useless. Well, it isn't cut and dried yet. Give it another couple weeks. It sounds like there are plenty of witnesses to what happened, so the truth should come out. And yes, Sharpton is useless. Unless you're a thug that wants a new TV, in which case he makes a good distraction from your looting.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2014 23:50:48 GMT -5
It should be easy enough to clear this up. If the officer did indeed suffer a severe eye injury, then he should have been taken for treatment and there'd be records of that somewhere.
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Aug 21, 2014 0:38:23 GMT -5
It should be easy enough to clear this up. If the officer did indeed suffer a severe eye injury, then he should have been taken for treatment and there'd be records of that somewhere. That's what I thought too I don't like criminals or rogue cops so I'm on the fence about the shooting.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2014 0:43:35 GMT -5
The New York Post is now reporting that the officer suffered an orbital blowout fracture, but they're citing Gateway Pundit as the source of the story.
|
|
|
Post by winston on Aug 21, 2014 6:39:43 GMT -5
As of this moment, there is no proof either way. What there appears to be are multiple, as yet anonymous sources, telling this information to the media. I am sure, at some point, there will be proof. Until then, asserting that it's a lie is, itself, a lie. This case is not cut and dried. Sharpton is useless. Brown's family feels different. Please explain? Do you ever back anything up?
|
|
|
Post by winston on Aug 21, 2014 6:40:59 GMT -5
The New York Post is now reporting that the officer suffered an orbital blowout fracture, but they're citing Gateway Pundit as the source of the story. Gateway Pundit as the source of the story. LOLROTF
|
|