Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2014 20:26:31 GMT -5
Perhaps it's time to bury this stillborn string of nothing. Don't want to see the thread any more, it's easy, just follow the instructions that I posted for Ranger John and your problem will be solved.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Aug 26, 2014 20:29:56 GMT -5
And yet, Shari'a is used to decide heirs, ownership of property, and rights in marriage, among other things. That supplant's British law. Nope! Wrong again, sharia has not supplanted British law. When it's used in place of established law, it's supplanted that law. And British courts are being advised as to how to apply Shari'a. Sorry, but Shari'a law is supplanting British law, because you have leaders that are too afraid of 'offending' the permanently offended Muslims, so are surrendering what liberties you have left for you.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2014 20:49:29 GMT -5
Nope! Wrong again, sharia has not supplanted British law. When it's used in place of established law, it's supplanted that law. And British courts are being advised as to how to apply Shari'a. Sorry, but Shari'a law is supplanting British law, because you have leaders that are too afraid of 'offending' the permanently offended Muslims, so are surrendering what liberties you have left for you. You can keep repeating it but it won't make it true. Sharia Law has not supplanted British law. You are making a total arse of yourself with these ridiculous repeated falsehoods. You really should learn that when you keep running head first into a wall, it's smart to stop when your nose starts bleeding.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Aug 26, 2014 20:59:55 GMT -5
When it's used in place of established law, it's supplanted that law. And British courts are being advised as to how to apply Shari'a. Sorry, but Shari'a law is supplanting British law, because you have leaders that are too afraid of 'offending' the permanently offended Muslims, so are surrendering what liberties you have left for you. You can keep repeating it but it won't make it true. Sharia Law has not supplanted British law. You are making a total arse of yourself with these ridiculous repeated falsehoods. You really should learn that when you keep running head first into a wall, it's smart to stop when your nose starts bleeding. Maybe you should wake up and smell the coffee and realize that Britain is becoming part of the Caliphate. You have to change your entire legal structure to become part of the Caliphate, and that's what's happening. Shari'a is supplanting British law. No matter how much you deny it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2014 5:59:52 GMT -5
You can keep repeating it but it won't make it true. Sharia Law has not supplanted British law. You are making a total arse of yourself with these ridiculous repeated falsehoods. You really should learn that when you keep running head first into a wall, it's smart to stop when your nose starts bleeding. Maybe you should wake up and smell the coffee and realize that Britain is becoming part of the Caliphate. You have to change your entire legal structure to become part of the Caliphate, and that's what's happening. Shari'a is supplanting British law. No matter how much you deny it. To say that sharia is supplanting British law is really idiotic and stupid, I struggle to believe your level of ignorance in that statement. Only in your head could such tripe be conjured up.
|
|
|
Post by vosa on Aug 27, 2014 13:37:03 GMT -5
As used above it is meaningless. You have to use it in a sentence for it to make any sense. Let me help you out with that: Sentence:
a word, clause, or phrase or a group of clauses or phrases forming a syntactic unit which expresses an assertion, a question, a command, a wish, an exclamation, or the performance of an action, that in writing usually begins with a capital letter and concludes with appropriate end punctuation, and that in speaking is distinguished by characteristic patterns of stress, pitch, and pauses.Here's an example: "BE frequently uses words like Dog turd/Jew/dose of syphilis when he knows he has lost the argument."Now you try it. Holy Conflations! Cut and Paste Kid... so 'Thieving land grabbers/Murderous thugs/Israeli/Terrorist/Jews' is acceptable to you, who'd thunk it? Time for another cut 'n paste. Vo/sa. Before you criticize people who cut and paste I suggest that you look at the 1st post in this thread. Let me try this one more time: I can not comment on the acceptability of 'Thieving land grabbers/Murderous thugs/Israeli/Terrorist/Jews' because you have not used it in a sentence. Perhaps because you're afraid to or perhaps because you can't. If it's the latter see my cut-and-paste definition of a sentence above for help.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2014 14:59:02 GMT -5
Holy Conflations! Cut and Paste Kid... so 'Thieving land grabbers/Murderous thugs/Israeli/Terrorist/Jews' is acceptable to you, who'd thunk it? Time for another cut 'n paste. Vo/sa. Before you criticize people who cut and paste I suggest that you look at the 1st post in this thread. Let me try this one more time: I can not comment on the acceptability of 'Thieving land grabbers/Murderous thugs/Israeli/Terrorist/Jews' because you have not used it in a sentence. Perhaps because you're afraid to or perhaps because you can't. If it's the latter see my cut-and-paste definition of a sentence above for help. Try it as many times as you want kid... duck and dive as much as you like, but back to t he original point, typing "Jews/israeli" is conflating the two, as my subsequent 'suggestions' were also Conflations. I'm just more honest than you are. And to any that I have offended with my 'conflations', I apologize, no offense was meant. My examples were merely to demonstrate that vosa did in fact conflate Jews with Israel. He can't have it both ways, some times "anti-Semitism" comes back and bites you in the arse.
|
|
|
Post by vosa on Aug 27, 2014 15:29:21 GMT -5
Before you criticize people who cut and paste I suggest that you look at the 1st post in this thread. Let me try this one more time: I can not comment on the acceptability of 'Thieving land grabbers/Murderous thugs/Israeli/Terrorist/Jews' because you have not used it in a sentence. Perhaps because you're afraid to or perhaps because you can't. If it's the latter see my cut-and-paste definition of a sentence above for help. Try it as many times as you want kid... duck and dive as much as you like, but back to t he original point, typing "Jews/israeli" is conflating the two, as my subsequent 'suggestions' were also Conflations. I'm just more honest than you are. And to any that I have offended with my 'conflations', I apologize, no offense was meant. My examples were merely to demonstrate that vosa did in fact conflate Jews with Israel. He can't have it both ways, some times "anti-Semitism" comes back and bites you in the arse. That's you opinion. You have "proved" nothing.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Aug 27, 2014 19:57:24 GMT -5
When it's used in place of established law, it's supplanted that law. And British courts are being advised as to how to apply Shari'a. Sorry, but Shari'a law is supplanting British law, because you have leaders that are too afraid of 'offending' the permanently offended Muslims, so are surrendering what liberties you have left for you. You can keep repeating it but it won't make it true. Sharia Law has not supplanted British law. You are making a total arse of yourself with these ridiculous repeated falsehoods. You really should learn that when you keep running head first into a wall, it's smart to stop when your nose starts bleeding. I'm sorry your ideological blindness doesn't allow you to see the truth, but when subjects are tried under Shari'a law, or when they use Shari'a for inheritance, ownership, or anything else that has to go through the courts, and when your own legal system is 'advising' judges and lawyers about accomodating Shari'a, it's supplanted British law. Deal with it.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Aug 27, 2014 19:58:11 GMT -5
Maybe you should wake up and smell the coffee and realize that Britain is becoming part of the Caliphate. You have to change your entire legal structure to become part of the Caliphate, and that's what's happening. Shari'a is supplanting British law. No matter how much you deny it. To say that sharia is supplanting British law is really idiotic and stupid, I struggle to believe your level of ignorance in that statement. Only in your head could such tripe be conjured up. Maybe, but it's true. Your country has surrendered to the terrorists, and is becoming a member of the Caliphate.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2014 20:34:16 GMT -5
You can keep repeating it but it won't make it true. Sharia Law has not supplanted British law. You are making a total arse of yourself with these ridiculous repeated falsehoods. You really should learn that when you keep running head first into a wall, it's smart to stop when your nose starts bleeding. I'm sorry your ideological blindness doesn't allow you to see the truth, but when subjects are tried under Shari'a law, or when they use Shari'a for inheritance, ownership, or anything else that has to go through the courts, and when your own legal system is 'advising' judges and lawyers about accomodating Shari'a, it's supplanted British law. Deal with it. I struggle to believe that you continue to make the idiotic statement that sharia law has supplanted British Law. Such a complete display of ignorance on your part.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2014 20:35:33 GMT -5
To say that sharia is supplanting British law is really idiotic and stupid, I struggle to believe your level of ignorance in that statement. Only in your head could such tripe be conjured up. Maybe, but it's true. Your country has surrendered to the terrorists, and is becoming a member of the Caliphate. Only an uneducated bigot could make such an idiotic statement.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Aug 28, 2014 9:01:54 GMT -5
Maybe, but it's true. Your country has surrendered to the terrorists, and is becoming a member of the Caliphate. Only an uneducated bigot could make such an idiotic statement. Or someone that is actually seeing it happen. Only an ideological useful idiot would deny what's happening right before their eyes.
|
|
|
Post by howarewegoingtopay on Aug 28, 2014 9:18:35 GMT -5
linklinkI wonder who is living with their head in the sand.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2014 10:09:44 GMT -5
Only an uneducated bigot could make such an idiotic statement. Or someone that is actually seeing it happen. Only an ideological useful idiot would deny what's happening right before their eyes. So at least you have given up on that ridiculously idiotic 'sharia is supplanting British law' lie. There is hope for you yet.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2014 10:23:46 GMT -5
linklinkI wonder who is living with their head in the sand. Just think, If British politicians were as corrupt and malleable as the US Senators and Representatives that allow 2.2% of is people (the Jews) to control their country, and if the British people were half as dumb as the Americans to allow that situation to happen, then there could be some cause for fear that further down the road Muslims could take over. Of course that's assuming that every single Muslim in the country and yet to be born will be a radical Islamist and not a single one of them assimilates into their community and surroundings. The US has been far more usurped by Jews than any European country has been by Muslims. That is a straight hard cold fact. Ask yourself that question again, just who is living with their head in the sand, or perhaps more accurately, living in Israel's pocket?
|
|
|
Post by vosa on Aug 28, 2014 12:05:17 GMT -5
linklinkI wonder who is living with their head in the sand. Just think, If British politicians were as corrupt and malleable as the US Senators and Representatives that allow 2.2% of is people (the Jews) to control their country, and if the British people were half as dumb as the Americans to allow that situation to happen, then there could be some cause for fear that further down the road Muslims could take over. Of course that's assuming that every single Muslim in the country and yet to be born will be a radical Islamist and not a single one of them assimilates into their community and surroundings. The US has been far more usurped by Jews than any European country has been by Muslims. That is a straight hard cold fact. Ask yourself that question again, just who is living with their head in the sand, or perhaps more accurately, living in Israel's pocket? More speculation, flat out lying or an opinion. No proof provided. Just like no proof was provided to support the charge that I conflated Israelis with Jews. If you want to be taken as a serious person then you need to start providing some proof when you make a statement otherwise you will be considered just another JV mountebank.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2014 12:35:30 GMT -5
Just think, If British politicians were as corrupt and malleable as the US Senators and Representatives that allow 2.2% of is people (the Jews) to control their country, and if the British people were half as dumb as the Americans to allow that situation to happen, then there could be some cause for fear that further down the road Muslims could take over. Of course that's assuming that every single Muslim in the country and yet to be born will be a radical Islamist and not a single one of them assimilates into their community and surroundings. The US has been far more usurped by Jews than any European country has been by Muslims. That is a straight hard cold fact. Ask yourself that question again, just who is living with their head in the sand, or perhaps more accurately, living in Israel's pocket? More speculation, flat out lying or an opinion. No proof provided. Just like no proof was provided to support the charge that I conflated Israelis with Jews. If you want to be taken as a serious person then you need to start providing some proof when you make a statement otherwise you will be considered just another JV mountebank. "I want to tell you something very clear, don't worry about American pressure on Israel, we, the Jewish people control America, and the Americans know it."
- Ariel Sharon to Shimon Peres, October 3rd, 2001, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio. "Israel may have the right to put others on trial, but certainly no one has the right to put the Jewish people and the State of Israel on trial," - Ariel Sharon How do you suppose that Ariel Sharon can be so confident that "we, the Jewish people control America and the Americans know it" Some reading for you to poo poo.
|
|
|
Post by vosa on Aug 28, 2014 12:38:52 GMT -5
So is everything Ariel Sharon said true?
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Aug 29, 2014 9:43:04 GMT -5
linklinkI wonder who is living with their head in the sand. Just think, If British politicians were as corrupt and malleable as the US Senators and Representatives that allow 2.2% of is people (the Jews) to control their country, and if the British people were half as dumb as the Americans to allow that situation to happen, then there could be some cause for fear that further down the road Muslims could take over. Of course that's assuming that every single Muslim in the country and yet to be born will be a radical Islamist and not a single one of them assimilates into their community and surroundings. The US has been far more usurped by Jews than any European country has been by Muslims. That is a straight hard cold fact. Ask yourself that question again, just who is living with their head in the sand, or perhaps more accurately, living in Israel's pocket? Well, at least we haven't rewritten our legal system to use Shari'a in place of our real laws. Britain has.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2014 9:52:10 GMT -5
Just think, If British politicians were as corrupt and malleable as the US Senators and Representatives that allow 2.2% of is people (the Jews) to control their country, and if the British people were half as dumb as the Americans to allow that situation to happen, then there could be some cause for fear that further down the road Muslims could take over. Of course that's assuming that every single Muslim in the country and yet to be born will be a radical Islamist and not a single one of them assimilates into their community and surroundings. The US has been far more usurped by Jews than any European country has been by Muslims. That is a straight hard cold fact. Ask yourself that question again, just who is living with their head in the sand, or perhaps more accurately, living in Israel's pocket? Well, at least we haven't rewritten our legal system to use Shari'a in place of our real laws. Britain has. Nope! Wrong again. Sharia is only allowed within the British Legal system, not in place of it. Give it up dude, no matter how you try to word it or work it, Sharia law is only a sub set of the British law, the same as the Jewish Beth Din law.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Aug 29, 2014 10:12:32 GMT -5
Well, at least we haven't rewritten our legal system to use Shari'a in place of our real laws. Britain has. Nope! Wrong again. Sharia is only allowed within the British Legal system, not in place of it. Give it up dude, no matter how you try to word it or work it, Sharia law is only a sub set of the British law, the same as the Jewish Beth Din law. IOW, it replaces 1000 years of British law with Islamic law. You can't have 2 systems of law. If you allow one, it has to replace the other.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2014 10:30:56 GMT -5
Nope! Wrong again. Sharia is only allowed within the British Legal system, not in place of it. Give it up dude, no matter how you try to word it or work it, Sharia law is only a sub set of the British law, the same as the Jewish Beth Din law. IOW, it replaces 1000 years of British law with Islamic law. You can't have 2 systems of law. If you allow one, it has to replace the other. No it does not replace British law, that is a stupid, idiotic assertion. There is only one law of the land in Britain, any other subset of byelaws have to adhere to it and work within its boundaries. How dense does one have to be to not understand such a simple fact?
|
|
|
Post by vosa on Aug 29, 2014 15:36:19 GMT -5
So is everything Ariel Sharon said true? Congratulation BE, you know you've painted yourself into a corner so you just ignore my question. Self awareness is a good thing. Keep at it.
|
|
|
Post by redleg on Aug 29, 2014 15:47:51 GMT -5
IOW, it replaces 1000 years of British law with Islamic law. You can't have 2 systems of law. If you allow one, it has to replace the other. No it does not replace British law, that is a stupid, idiotic assertion. There is only one law of the land in Britain, any other subset of byelaws have to adhere to it and work within its boundaries. How dense does one have to be to not understand such a simple fact? Shari'a is antithetical to British law. They are diametrically opposed. How can it "adhere to and work within the boundaries" of a law it doesn't recognize? And every time Shari'a is used instead of British law, regardless of whether the participants "voluntarily" accept it, it supplants the British law that was formerly used. It's supplanting British law. You just refuse to recognize it.
|
|