|
Post by howarewegoingtopay on Nov 7, 2013 19:11:58 GMT -5
Seems like non republicans have an advantage in numbers on this forum! Lol True, but lefties are still a minority.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2013 19:16:36 GMT -5
Seems like non republicans have an advantage in numbers on this forum! Lol True, but lefties are still a minority. Then there are those of us who are unaffiliated.
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Nov 7, 2013 19:45:02 GMT -5
True, but lefties are still a minority. Then there are those of us who are unaffiliated. Give me a break mom- all- things- republican
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Nov 7, 2013 19:46:06 GMT -5
Seems like non republicans have an advantage in numbers on this forum! Lol True, but lefties are still a minority. Will that's super awesome for you guys. You guys outnumber people on forums, everyone else wins elections. Ha ha ha. What is it like 50 to 1 here with crazy right-wingers to normal people?
|
|
|
Post by drjohnnyfever on Nov 7, 2013 19:49:48 GMT -5
True, but lefties are still a minority. Will that's super awesome for you guys. You guys outnumber people on forums, everyone else wins elections. Ha ha ha. What is it like 50 to 1 here with crazy right-wingers to normal people? Well the left won the last 2 presidential elections- how's that workin' out for you?
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Nov 7, 2013 19:52:05 GMT -5
Will that's super awesome for you guys. You guys outnumber people on forums, everyone else wins elections. Ha ha ha. What is it like 50 to 1 here with crazy right-wingers to normal people? Well the left won the last 2 presidential elections- how's that workin' out for you? I didn't vote for Obama last time and still he would've been better then freaking Romney my God and of course the previous ones with good old Sarah ha ha ha ha. It's like you're defending the Washington wizards or something
|
|
|
Post by aponderer on Nov 7, 2013 20:00:14 GMT -5
Seems like non republicans have an advantage in numbers on this forum! Lol Caught you napping, eh? Where've you been?
|
|
|
Post by drjohnnyfever on Nov 7, 2013 20:01:04 GMT -5
Well the left won the last 2 presidential elections- how's that workin' out for you? I didn't vote for Obama last time and still he would've been better then freaking Romney my God and of course the previous ones with good old Sarah ha ha ha ha. It's like you're defending the Washington wizards or something The fact that you didn't vote for him is irrelevant and neither palin nor romney is pres-so what's your point? Unless your happy with the way things are going?
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Nov 7, 2013 20:03:03 GMT -5
I didn't vote for Obama last time and still he would've been better then freaking Romney my God and of course the previous ones with good old Sarah ha ha ha ha. It's like you're defending the Washington wizards or something The fact that you didn't vote for him is irrelevant and neither palin nor romney is pres-so what's your point? Unless your happy with the way things are going? Put it this way. I am thrilled that the people that represent you and the other posters in here are not in power. My god that is such a relief.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2013 20:05:42 GMT -5
Will that's super awesome for you guys. You guys outnumber people on forums, everyone else wins elections. Ha ha ha. What is it like 50 to 1 here with crazy right-wingers to normal people? Well the left won the last 2 presidential elections- how's that workin' out for you? Good question. Taxes are higher and sadly millions are losing healthcare. What's not to like?
|
|
|
Post by drjohnnyfever on Nov 7, 2013 20:06:06 GMT -5
The fact that you didn't vote for him is irrelevant and neither palin nor romney is pres-so what's your point? Unless your happy with the way things are going? Put it this way. I am thrilled that the people that represent you and the other posters in here are not in power. My god that is such a relief. You are a very, very confused and angry individual and there's a reason I ignore 99% of your postings. Have a nice day.
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Nov 7, 2013 20:07:43 GMT -5
Put it this way. I am thrilled that the people that represent you and the other posters in here are not in power. My god that is such a relief. You are a very, very confused and angry individual and there's a reason I ignore 99% of your postings. Have a nice day. That's one of the biggest and brightest white flags I've ever seen!
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Nov 7, 2013 20:08:33 GMT -5
Well the left won the last 2 presidential elections- how's that workin' out for you? Good question. Taxes are higher and sadly millions are losing healthcare. What's not to like? I'm sorry, but do you even have a clue of what you are talking about?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2013 20:11:55 GMT -5
zen, the 5% in question are people who ALREADY had insurance, and are now losing it. If they could already afford insurance, they're not going to be eligible for Medicaid. And honestly, even if there is are a handful of people wealthy enough to buy private insurance and still qualify for Medicaid, this is NOT a good thing. Comparatively speaking, Medicaid is a lousy substitute for regular insurance. It's anecdotal of course but the two people I know that were dumped are both better off, frankly. What gets offered is a new policy meeting minimum standards at double the existing premium. In the two cases I'm familiar with both were paying 3-400 a month to begin with. Yes, I get your point now. Thought you were referring to the overall percentage of Americans being channeled to Medicaid. BTW, You need to be rock solid poor to qualify for Medicaid. I had to look into it earlier this year regarding a dying relative's estate and was told you had to be down to your last $2,000. That's pretty rock bottom even by republican standards. The paperwork by the way is best described as punishing. The free lunches are meager these days but the need has never been greater. Double the existing premium hardly sounds better off. An extra 300-400 dollars a month is not a small amount of money- if they can swing that at all.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2013 20:13:17 GMT -5
True, but lefties are still a minority. Will that's super awesome for you guys. You guys outnumber people on forums, everyone else wins elections. Ha ha ha. What is it like 50 to 1 here with crazy right-wingers to normal people? I know, it's a shame we don't control the House, have nearly half the senate, over 30 of the state governorships, and the majority of state legislatures.. Oh.....wait a minute......
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2013 20:13:37 GMT -5
It's anecdotal of course but the two people I know that were dumped are both better off, frankly. What gets offered is a new policy meeting minimum standards at double the existing premium. In the two cases I'm familiar with both were paying 3-400 a month to begin with. Yes, I get your point now. Thought you were referring to the overall percentage of Americans being channeled to Medicaid. BTW, You need to be rock solid poor to qualify for Medicaid. I had to look into it earlier this year regarding a dying relative's estate and was told you had to be down to your last $2,000. That's pretty rock bottom even by republican standards. The paperwork by the way is best described as punishing. The free lunches are meager these days but the need has never been greater. Double the existing premium hardly sounds better off. An extra 300-400 dollars a month is not a small amount of money- if they can swing that at all. But but it is better healthcare. What 90 year old woman would not be happy paying for maternity care? Accidents do happen.
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Nov 7, 2013 20:16:54 GMT -5
Will that's super awesome for you guys. You guys outnumber people on forums, everyone else wins elections. Ha ha ha. What is it like 50 to 1 here with crazy right-wingers to normal people? I know, it's a shame we don't control the House, have nearly half the senate, over 30 of the state governorships, and the majority of state legislatures.. Oh.....wait a minute...... Ha ha wait I thought you were a libertarian. You said that yesterday
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Nov 7, 2013 20:18:33 GMT -5
Again you guys are just bizarre. You keep talking about how you're libertarians. You love Ron Paul. Yet it's Republican candidates left and right and people like mitt Romney John McCain and Sarah Palin. Nothing adds up that you guys do. Has there even been a libertarian elected yet? You need to start living in the real world.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2013 20:21:33 GMT -5
I know, it's a shame we don't control the House, have nearly half the senate, over 30 of the state governorships, and the majority of state legislatures.. Oh.....wait a minute...... Ha ha wait I thought you were a libertarian. You said that yesterday I am- and the closest party to represent my beliefs in national elections is the Republican Party. They aren't perfect- but thank G-d they are far, far away from being Democrats!!
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Nov 7, 2013 20:23:25 GMT -5
Ha ha wait I thought you were a libertarian. You said that yesterday I am- and the closest party to represent my beliefs in national elections is the Republican Party. They aren't perfect- but thank G-d they are far, far away from being Democrats!! You said WE!!!!!!!! okay hotdoggy .. Whatever you believe. So you're a libertarian that elects Republicans. That's what you all say. Your talk and then what you do doesn't add up at all.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2013 20:25:49 GMT -5
Again you guys are just bizarre. You keep talking about how you're libertarians. You love Ron Paul. Yet it's Republican candidates left and right and people like mitt Romney John McCain and Sarah Palin. Nothing adds up that you guys do. Has there even been a libertarian elected yet? You need to start living in the real world. No- that's why we often vote for, and root for, a Republican- simply not enough Libertarians to win anything more than a local election or two. Reality-- you do your best to influence the larger party. That's why the Pauls are Republicans. That's modern American political reality. I'd be surprised if you didn't root for the Green Party-- but in an election between a Democrat, a Green, and a Republican, where you knew the Dem would lose to a very right-wing guy if too many voted Green- what would be the best vote to serve your interests??
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2013 20:26:33 GMT -5
I am- and the closest party to represent my beliefs in national elections is the Republican Party. They aren't perfect- but thank G-d they are far, far away from being Democrats!! You said WE!!!!!!!! okay hotdoggy .. Whatever you believe. So you're a libertarian that elects Republicans. That's what you all say. Your talk and then what you do doesn't add up at all. Yes it does- read my reply to your prior post.
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Nov 7, 2013 20:27:05 GMT -5
I try to vote for whoever represents my views as close as possible. I don't play games.
|
|
|
Post by drjohnnyfever on Nov 7, 2013 20:31:23 GMT -5
The fact that you didn't vote for him is irrelevant and neither palin nor romney is pres-so what's your point? Unless your happy with the way things are going? Put it this way. I am thrilled that the people that represent you and the other posters in here are not in power. My god that is such a relief. So those in power represent you? Thanks-I thought as much.
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Nov 7, 2013 20:31:24 GMT -5
I live in a state full of far right crazies, and they all think that there Libertarian too I see Ron Paul stickers everywhere, yet they elect and reelect repubs.
I really think you guys are actually embarrassed to be associated the Republican Party is been in a terrible down spiral ever since George Bush was president.
|
|